Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ellis Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$110kHuman Services$24kHealth$7kEducation$5kPhilanthropy$5kArts & Culture$1kCivil Rights$1kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Appalachian Service Project$10,000
Al's Angels$9,000
Individual grant recipient$4,300
Individual grant recipient$3,500
SHADOW WOOD CHARITABLE$1,600
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Petaluma Educational Foundatn$300
ST MATTHEWS HOUSE$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $200 → 9%Al's Angels: $9k → 9%Al's Angels: $3k → 9%Al's Angels: $3k → 9%Al's Angels: $2k → 9%Al's Angels: $2k → 9%Al's Angels: $2k → 9%Al's Angels: $2k → 9%Al's Angels: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
NV
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 10 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$188k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
-1%

Still filing today

60%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +88%
  • AA
    ALS ANGELS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +10%
  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +205%

Funded once

  • TC
    TRINITY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • MF
    METPGA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TA
    The Angel Charitable Corporation
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
2
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
4
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
5
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
8
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
9
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
12
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Collier Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Animal Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $107,800 · Housing & ShelterAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC+1 more: $2,050 · Housing & ShelterIndividual grant recipient: $39,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 · Other+18 more: $15,700 · Other+18 moreALS ANGELS INC: $23,250 · Human ServicesALS ANGELS I…+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesPETALUMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationPEO Foundation: $700 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College: $200 · EducationKAITLYN'S COTTAGE INC: $1,000 · HealthANIMAL CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthKERRY'S KIDS: $250 · Health
Housing & Shelter$109,850Other$68,100Human Services$23,450Education$2,400Health$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $107,800 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetALS ANGELS INC: $23,250 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $2,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPETALUMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Angel Charitable Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKAITLYN'S COTTAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPEO Foundation: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL GULF COAST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLASP HOMES INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS VERMONT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKERRY'S KIDS: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PETALUMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
  • Who funds The Angel Charitable Corporation ↗
  • Who funds KAITLYN'S COTTAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEO Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL GULF COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds CLASP HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS VERMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds KERRY'S KIDS ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ellis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ellis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 91%
  • Clasp Homes Inc: 91% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ellis Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ellis Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ellis Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph