Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edward Novakoff Charitable Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Arts & Culture$17kFood & Nutrition$8kHealth$4kEducation$3kPhilanthropy$650International$500Housing & Shelter$150Human Services$150Other$0
02FY2019 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k8 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$450
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TALL SHIP PROVIDENCE FOUNDATION$16,536
MASS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY GARDENS AT ELM BANK$7,500
PMC JIMMY FUND$2,500
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER$500
MARION ART CENTER$450
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$380
FOUNDATION FOR METROWEST$300
GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL$250
TRUSTEES OF THE RESERVATION$70
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY GARDENS AT ELM BANK: $8k → 7%MARION ART CENTER: $450 → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $100 → 8%SIMMONS COLLEGE: $150 → 16%BIKE AND BUILD: $150 → 22%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK: $380 → 14%GOOD SAMARITANS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $150 → 16%TALL SHIP PROVIDENCE FOUNDATION: $17k → 9%DANA HALL SCHOOL: $3k → 7%MARION ARTS CENTER: $300 → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $50 → 8%SIMMONS COLLEGE: $100 → 16%PMC JIMMY FUND: $3k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR METROWEST: $300 → 8%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $500 → 16%FOUNDATION FOR METROWEST: $250 → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100 → 16%FOUNDATION FOR METROWEST: $100 → 8%GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL: $250 → 16%GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL: $250 → 16%TRUSTEES OF THE RESERVATION: $70 → 16%TENACITY: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

5%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2k · 4 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$2k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+26%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    Marion Art Center Inc
    2× · 2017–2019 · $750 · revenue +184%
  • GI
    GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $500 · revenue +56%
  • SIMMONS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $250 · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • DANA HALL SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +26%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITANS COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2018 · $150
  • BA
    Bike And Build Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $150 · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
3
Massachusetts Business Roundtable Inc

The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…

—
4
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
7
Bsa Foundation

The bsa foundation exists to improve the quality of life for boston-area residents by championing the innovation in the built environment. as a community non-profit organization, we achieve this mission in partnership with the boston…

Arts & Culture
8
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
9
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
10
Danvers Community Access Television Incorporated

Manage facilities for community access programming on the public educational & governmental access channels.

Public Benefit
11
Boston Society of Architects

The boston society of architects (bsa/aia) exists to improve the quality of life for boston-area residents by championing innovation in the built environment. as a membership association, we achieve this mission in partnership with the bsa…

—
12
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marion Art Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Tall Ship Providence Foundation: $16,536 · Arts & CultureTall Ship Providence FoundationMarion Art Center Inc: $750 · Arts & CultureMASS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY GARDENS AT ELM BANK: $7,500 · OtherMASS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY GARDENS A…PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,500 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC+6 more: $670 · Other+6 moreDANA HALL SCHOOL: $2,600 · EducationDANA HALL…SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $250 · EducationSIMMONS U…BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $500 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $380 · HealthCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc: $650 · PhilanthropyGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 · InternationalBike And Build Inc: $150 · Environment
Arts & Culture$17,286Other$10,670Education$2,850Health$880Philanthropy$650International$500Environment$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTall Ship Providence Foundation: $16,536 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetDANA HALL SCHOOL: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarion Art Center Inc: $750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBike And Build Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE SQUARES NEW ENGLAND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTENACITY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edward Novakoff Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edward Novakoff Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Simmons University: 1% of income from government
  • Marion Art Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Edward Novakoff Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Edward Novakoff Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward Novakoff’s filings →

More from the funding graph