Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edward and Darenda Sheridan Foundati

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$153kEducation$58kHealth$42kYouth Development$3k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$6,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TELLURIDE FOUNDATION$15,000
SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR$6,500
SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL FDN$5,000
TELLURIDE ACADEMY$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 10%TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $30k → 7%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $5k → 14%NATIONAL WINTER ACTIVITY CENTER: $3k → 6%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $28k → 11%LINK EDUCATIONAL PARTNERS: $3k → 16%SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 10%TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $30k → 7%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%LINK COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3k → 16%SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 10%TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $30k → 7%TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 10%TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $15k → 7%TELLURIDE ACADEMY: $4k → 7%TELLURIDE ACADEMY: $4k → 7%TELLURIDE ACADEMY: $4k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 3 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -50% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$79k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-50%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +459%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    2× · 2020–2021 · $33k · revenue +51%
  • TT
    THE TELLURIDE ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -58%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WINTER ACTIVITY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -3%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
2
New Jersey Scholars Elite

New jersey scholars exists to help young adults and their families pursue excellence in all facets of their lives by using competitive basketball as a platform. this pursuit of excellence encompasses academics, citizenship and…

—
3
Paideia Academy

The organization provides a christian,classical education to enrolled students. paideia academy is an instrument to assist christian parents in carrying out the biblical mandate to bring up their children in thepaideiaof the lord. we…

Education
4
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
5
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
6
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
7
Twin Peaks Charter Academy

The organization provides students with a rigorous education and the foundations of virtue and character, while building cultural literacy through a content-rich curriculum in an encouraging environment.

Education
8
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
9
The York School

York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…

Education
10
Sage Hill School

We inspire in our students a love of knowledge and the ability to use that knowledge creatively, compassionately and courageously throughout their lives.sage hill school's commitment to academic excellence and our outstanding college…

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Winter Activity Center; the most unlike its peers is Special Friends Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsTELLURIDE FOUNDATION+1 more: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsThe Trustees of Princeton University: $32,500 · EducationThe Trustees of Princ…THE TELLURIDE ACADEMY INC: $10,500 · EducationTHE TELLURIDE ACADEMY…CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMYSPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 · HealthSPECIAL FRIENDS…MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR: $6,500 · OtherSUMMIT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · OtherLINK EDUCATION PARTNERS INC: $2,500 · OtherLINK COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $2,500 · Other
Recreation & Sports$152,500Education$48,000Health$35,500Other$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TELLURIDE ACADEMY INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMIT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WINTER ACTIVITY CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINK EDUCATION PARTNERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edward and Darenda Sheridan Foundati funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edward and Darenda Sheridan Foundati. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Edward and Darenda Sheridan Foundati?

Find your warmest path to The Edward and Darenda Sheridan Foundati through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward and Darenda Sheridan Foundati’s filings →

More from the funding graph