Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$92kInternational$55kHuman Services$50kArts & Culture$21kEducation$13kAnimals$10kCivil Rights$7kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$769k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BLUE CARD INC$15,000
MAYO CLINIC$5,000
THE BRAVE HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BLUE CARD INC: $15k → 17%The Blue Card: $9k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $7k → 17%The Blue Card: $7k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $3k → 17%The Blue Card: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 60% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 56%.

The Edith Berg Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 12 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$199k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+21%

Still filing today

42%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalCivil RightsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    EMERGENCY USA
    5× · 2017–2023 · $45k · revenue +56%
  • BH
    BRAVE HOUSE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +98%
  • BL
    BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL
    3× · 2018–2023 · $750 · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • HF
    Hospital for Special Surgery
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • NY
    New York University
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +21%
  • SB
    SOARING BEYOND OUR LIMITS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
4
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Foundation for Research of the New York Academy of Osteopathy Inc
—
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Physicians for Palestine
Health
12
Nyu Langone Health System

The board adopted mission statement is: the corporation is operated exclusively for the benefit of nyu langone hospitals and its affiliated organizations. in this capacity, the corporation, may, in order to improve the health and welfare…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust; the most unlike its peers is Frank Ridge Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Englewood Hospital: $52,500 · OtherEnglewood HospitalPET RESQ INC: $10,400 · OtherPET RESQ INCHospital for Special Surgery: $10,000 · OtherHospital for Special SurgeryNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE: $9,800 · OtherNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CAREBEAUTIFUL SELF INC: $8,400 · OtherBEAUTIFUL SELF INCSOARING BEYOND OUR LIMITS INC: $6,800 · OtherSOARING BEYOND OUR LIMITS INCMAYO Clinic: $6,800 · OtherMAYO Clinic+12 more: $22,760 · Other+12 moreTHE BLUE CARD INC: $47,200 · Human ServicesTHE BLUE CARD INCEMERGENCY USA: $45,100 · InternationalEMERGENCY USA+1 more: $500 · InternationalNew York University: $10,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 · EducationThe Renew Democracy Initiative Inc: $5,000 · EducationBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL: $750 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $180 · HealthBRAVE HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,500 · Civil RightsPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$127,460Human Services$47,200International$45,600Education$20,750Health$15,180Civil Rights$11,500Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC: $47,200 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGENCY USA: $45,100 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNew York University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE: $9,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBEAUTIFUL SELF INC: $8,400 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Renew Democracy Initiative Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BLUE CARD INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY USA ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BRAVE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE ↗
  • Who funds BEAUTIFUL SELF INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST ↗
  • Who funds The Renew Democracy Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FRANK RIDGE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Susan Zirkl Z L Memorial Charitable Foundation TrustNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Susan Zirkl Z L Memorial Charitable Foundation Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edith Berg’s filings →

More from the funding graph