Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $35k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
4
18
3
19
4
20
0
21
4
22
7
23
3
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$92kInternational$55kHuman Services$50kArts & Culture$21kEducation$13kAnimals$10kCivil Rights$7kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$746k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$5,000
MAYO CLINIC$5,000
ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL$5,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD$5,000
EMERGENCY USA$3,600
THE BLUE CARD INC$3,000
WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL$2,500
PET RESQ INC$1,800
NY FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE$1,800
FRANK RIDGE MEMORIALS FOUNDATION IN$1,000
AMERICAN COMMITEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK$500
HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER$500
BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Blue Card: $9k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $7k → 17%The Blue Card: $7k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $3k → 17%The Blue Card: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 60% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 56% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Edith Berg Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$174k · 11 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$174k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+43%

Still filing today

36%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalCivil RightsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    Englewood Hospital
    6× · 2017–2023 · $53k
  • EU
    EMERGENCY USA
    5× · 2017–2023 · $45k · revenue +56%
  • TB
    THE BLUE CARD INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue -1%

Funded once

  • HF
    Hospital for Special Surgery
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • NY
    New York University
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +21%
  • SB
    SOARING BEYOND OUR LIMITS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

4
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
5
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Foundation for Research of the New York Academy of Osteopathy Inc
11
Physicians for Palestine
Health
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust and the most unlike its peers is Frank Ridge Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Englewood Hospital — $52,500 · OtherEnglewood HospitalPET RESQ INC — $10,400 · OtherPET RESQ INCHospital for Special Surgery — $10,000 · OtherHospital for Special SurgeryNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE — $9,800 · OtherNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CAREBEAUTIFUL SELF INC — $8,400 · OtherBEAUTIFUL SELF INCSOARING BEYOND OUR LIMITS INC — $6,800 · OtherSOARING BEYOND OUR LIMITS INCMAYO Clinic — $6,800 · OtherMAYO Clinic+12 more — $22,760 · Other+12 moreEMERGENCY USA — $45,100 · InternationalEMERGENCY USA+1 more — $500 · InternationalTHE BLUE CARD INC — $32,200 · Human ServicesTHE BLUE CARD…New York University — $10,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $5,000 · EducationThe Renew Democracy Initiative Inc — $5,000 · EducationBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL — $750 · EducationMAYO CLINIC — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $180 · HealthPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $5,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureBRAVE HOUSE INC — $5,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,500 · Civil Rights
Other$127,460International$45,600Human Services$32,200Education$20,750Health$10,180Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Civil Rights$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEMERGENCY USA — $45,100 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC — $32,200 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE — $9,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBEAUTIFUL SELF INC — $8,400 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Renew Democracy Initiative Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRAVE HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Susan Zirkl Z L Memorial Charitable Foundation TrustNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Susan Zirkl Z L Memorial Charitable Foundation Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Edith Berg Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph