Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Indiana · Private foundation

The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
13
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2017
$25,000
States reached, FY2017
5
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Jewish Resource Center Chabad Of$25,0001n/a
Central Fund of Israel$11,0001n/a
Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America Inc$10,00010%
Aspen Santa Fe Ballet$7,50010%
National Jewish Health$5,00010%
Jazz at Aspen-Snowmass$3,25010%
Aspen Film$2,50010%
Theatre Aspen$1,93910%
Israel Guide Dog Center for the Blind$1,50010%
Aspen Community Theatre$50011%

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($3k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommittee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAspen Santa Fe Ballet: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Jewish Health: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJazz at Aspen-Snowmass: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Film: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTheatre Aspen: $1,939 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIsrael Guide Dog Center for the Blind: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Community Theatre: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community Found…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Aspen Community FoundationCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC?

Find your warmest path to The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC

How much does The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC give?
The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC reported 14 grants totaling $71,689 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Religion (35%), International (29%), Arts & Culture (22%).
Who are The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Jewish Resource Center Chabad Of ($25k), Central Fund of Israel ($11k), Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America Inc ($10k).
Does The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Aspen Community Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC based?
The Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC is based in IN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edith and David Altman Foundation co Legacy Adminstrative Services LLC’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home