Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Draizin Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Religion$42kEducation$25kYouth Development$16kPhilanthropy$11kHealth$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kHuman Services$4kEmployment$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALM BEACH GARDENS FIRE POLICE FOUN$4,000
BALLIN ISLE'S CHARITIES FOUNDATION$2,500
CHABAD OF PALM BEACH GARDENS$2,200
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS$1,782
BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION$1,500
THE PARKER COMPANIES CHARITY$1,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR CITY COLLEGE$1,000
AMERICAN SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL$500
EPIC LONG ISLAND$400
PLAY FOR PINK$175
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MILLER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%JCC MANHATTAN: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
AZ
NC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$100k · 22 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
12

Total granted

$100k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+132%

Still filing today

41%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE WINDWARD SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +13%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +98%
  • TI
    THE ISRAEL BRIDGE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1k · revenue +342%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BI-CULTURAL HEBREW ACADEMY OF CONNECTICUT INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • EC
    EAST CAROLINA BRODY SCHOOL OF MEDIC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bank Street College of Education and the most unlike its peers is The Miller Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STAMFORD JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $16,500 · OtherSTAMFORD JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERCHABAD OF PALM BEACH GARDENS INC — $16,215 · OtherCHABAD OF PALM BEACH GARDENS INCTHE BI-CULTURAL HEBREW ACADEMY OF CONNECTICUT INCORPORATED — $12,000 · OtherTHE BI-CULTURAL HEBREW ACADEMY OF CONNECTICUT INCORPORATEDVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS — $9,767 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONSPALM BEACH GARDENS FIRE POLICE FOUN — $7,900 · OtherPALM BEACH GARDENS FIRE POLICE FOUNBALLIN ISLE'S CHARITIES FOUNDATION — $7,625 · OtherBALLIN ISLE'S CHARITIES FOUNDATIONCONGREGATION OR TZION — $5,800 · OtherCONGREGATION OR TZIONEAST CAROLINA BRODY SCHOOL OF MEDIC — $5,000 · OtherSTAMFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $3,500 · Other+15 more — $15,115 · Other+15 moreSTAMFORD PEACE YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $13,750 · Youth DevelopmentSTAMFORD PE…THE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $2,500 · EducationBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $1,500 · EducationTHE ISRAEL BRIDGE — $1,400 · EducationLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC — $1,250 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR CITY COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesTHE MILLER FOUNDATION — $1,650 · Human ServicesTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $1,385 · HealthEPIC LONG ISLAND INC — $1,200 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,075 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,500 · InternationalPLAY FOR PINK INC — $585 · Crime & Legal
Other$99,422Youth Development$13,750Education$7,650Human Services$5,150Health$3,660International$1,500Crime & Legal$585

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTAMFORD PEACE YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $13,750 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILLER FOUNDATION — $1,650 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISRAEL BRIDGE — $1,400 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $1,385 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC — $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEPIC LONG ISLAND INC — $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,075 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR CITY COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $585 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STAMFORD PEACE YOUTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC
  • Who funds THE WINDWARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE MILLER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds THE ISRAEL BRIDGE
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds EPIC LONG ISLAND INC
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR CITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Draizin Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Draizin Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Draizin Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph