Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dr Charles J Homcy Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.0MHealth$1.7MHuman Services$222kInternational$77kReligion$59kScience & Tech$51kCrime & Legal$9kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Human Needs Project$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
The Living Room Life Center$10,000
UCFS Foundation$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,200
American Heart Association$1,046
Sandy Christman Foundation$1,000
IMPACT Melanoma$1,000
Larkin Street Youth Services$528
Canine Companions$518
Regis High School$500
Saint Sebastion's School$500
St Judes$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Human Needs Project: $60k → 8%Human Needs Project: $35k → 8%Human Needs Project: $25k → 8%Larkin Street Youth Services: $1k → 10%Human Needs Project: $25k → 8%Larkin Street Youth Services: $528 → 10%The Greg Hill Foundation: $580 → 8%Human Needs Project: $25k → 8%Larkin Street Youth: $525 → 10%Road To Responsibility: $1k → 8%Human Needs Project: $20k → 8%Larkin Street Youth: $500 → 10%American Red Cross: $500 → 14%Human Needs Project: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
NE
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 28 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
59

Total granted

$3.7M
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+22%

Still filing today

54%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +25%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $452k · revenue +125%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • LS
    Little Sisters of the Poor
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • VF
    VCSF Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • TF
    TOGETHER FOR LEBANON INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ukiah Senior Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,727,057 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $270,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATIONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $255,259 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSIT…+4 more: $2,608 · EducationMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $493,490 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORAT…Johns Hopkins: $422,700 · OtherJohns HopkinsLittle Sisters of the Poor: $50,000 · OtherVCSF Foundation: $50,000 · Other+61 more: $131,101 · Other+61 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $452,404 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…+7 more: $23,896 · HealthHuman Needs Project Inc: $210,000 · Human Services+5 more: $5,912 · Human ServicesInternational Rescue Committee INC: $50,000 · InternationalTOGETHER FOR LEBANON INC: $25,000 · International+2 more: $550 · InternationalREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $3,000 · Food & NutritionIRISH CULTURAL CENTRE INC: $700 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $500 · Arts & Culture
Education$2,254,924Other$1,147,291Health$476,300Human Services$215,912International$75,550Food & Nutrition$3,000Arts & Culture$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,727,057 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $452,404 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $270,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $255,259 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Needs Project Inc: $210,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER FOR LEBANON INC: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,046 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT MELANOMA INC: $8,050 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $2,553 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH SHORE HOSPITAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $1,218 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY INC: $1,061 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE SCIENCE CARES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A STUDENT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRISH CULTURAL CENTRE INC: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREG HILL FOUNDATION INC: $580 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNHL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUKIAH SENIOR CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNECMA FOUNDATION: $108 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMendocino Food and Nutrition Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDTCare: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Human Needs Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER FOR LEBANON INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT MELANOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SHORE HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dr Charles J Homcy Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dr Charles J Homcy Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Road to Responsibility Inc: 92% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc: 7% of income from government
  • South Shore Hospital Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Impact Melanoma Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Red Sox Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Museum of Science: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dr Charles J Homcy’s filings →

More from the funding graph