Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donnelley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$734k
Granted FY2024still arriving
152
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$959kArts & Culture$714kHealth$399kReligion$232kEnvironment$183kPhilanthropy$144kYouth Development$134kHuman Services$134kOther$0
02FY2024 · 152 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k123 grants · $261k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $473k
$2,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SONOMA TEACHING PROJECT$36,000
THE SONOMA TEACHING PROJECT$36,000
THE SONOMA TEACHING PROJECT$36,000
THE SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS$25,000
HELPING HANDS$20,000
MGH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL FOR PSYCHIATRIC FUND$20,000
CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS$20,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$20,000
LAKE FOREST COLLEGE$20,000
SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$20,000
THE MORTEM ARBORETUM$15,000
4THOSE$15,000
ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$15,000
NORTON MUSEUM OF ART$14,500
THE CHURCH OF BETHESDA-BY-THE-SEA$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS: $2k → 10%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 8%GORTON CENTER: $10k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 8%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%HELPING HAND CENTER: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 128 repeat orgs$686k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

128 repeat relationships: 69 still active in FY2024, 59 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

128
127

Total granted

$2.7M
$523k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+11%

Still filing today

61%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Lake Forest College
    5× · 2020–2024 · $142k · revenue +50%
  • CY
    Chicago Youth Centers
    5× · 2020–2024 · $124k · revenue +57%
  • NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $88k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHICAGO CLUB PRESERVATION FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • TA
    THE ARLINGTON COMMON CAPITAL CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TS
    THE SONOMA TEACHING PROIECT
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
4
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
6
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
7
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
8
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
9
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
10
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Field Museum of Natural History; the most unlike its peers is 4those. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 143 of the 299 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
142/143
Grantees still filing
98/143
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SONOMA TEACHING PROJECT: $534,000 · OtherTHE SONOMA TEACHING PROJECTUW FOUNDATION UW DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE: $150,288 · OtherUW FOUNDATION UW DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE+128 more: $1,345,844 · Other+128 moreLake Forest College: $142,000 · EducationLake Forest C…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $80,500 · EducationTHE ART INSTI…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $38,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLE…SONOMA CHARTER SCHOOL: $30,000 · EducationSONOMA CHARTE…The Renew Democracy Initiative Inc: $20,000 · EducationWheaton College: $15,500 · EducationTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC: $13,800 · Education+14 more: $68,350 · Education+14 moreNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $88,000 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM…The Society of the Four Arts Inc: $85,000 · Arts & CultureThe Society o…MONTANA HISTORY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMONTANA HISTO…FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $41,500 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM …NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $37,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL TRUS…Chicago Architecture Foundation: $16,000 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $65,950 · Arts & Culture+16 more4those: $42,000 · PhilanthropyTown of Palm Beach United Way Inc: $37,000 · PhilanthropyCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $24,700 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $24,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $6,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $62,500 · EnvironmentDrummond Island Sportsman Club: $18,000 · EnvironmentBRUSHWOOD CENTER AT RYERSON WOODS: $16,000 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $9,000 · EnvironmentFriends of Central Algoma Land Trust: $8,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · EnvironmentOccidental Arts and Ecology Center: $5,500 · EnvironmentRUBY HABITAT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Environment+5 more: $11,400 · EnvironmentChicago Youth Centers: $124,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $39,750 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $20,500 · AnimalsTROUT AND SALMON FOUNDATION: $20,000 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · AnimalsLITTLE ORPHANS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $7,845 · Animals
Other$2,030,132Education$408,650Arts & Culture$383,950Philanthropy$143,700Environment$142,400Youth Development$126,000Animals$98,095

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLake Forest College: $142,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Youth Centers: $124,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $88,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $85,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $80,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $62,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LORD'S PLACE INC: $52,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HISTORIC SECOND CHURCH: $51,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetMONTANA HISTORY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetLINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: $45,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budget4those: $42,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $41,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $39,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $38,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTown of Palm Beach United Way Inc: $37,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSONOMA CHARTER SCHOOL: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTEN RIGGS CENTER INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $24,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $24,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $20,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Renew Democracy Initiative Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTROUT AND SALMON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetDrummond Island Sportsman Club: $18,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetOPENLANDS: $16,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Architecture Foundation: $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBRUSHWOOD CENTER AT RYERSON WOODS: $16,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWheaton College: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC: $13,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGorton Community Center: $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGLESSNER HOUSE MUSEUM: $11,950 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKE FOREST PARKS & REC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Central Algoma Land Trust: $8,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetArlington Arts & Enrichment Program dba Arlington Common: $7,750 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP DUDLEY INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $6,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Youth Centers ↗
  • Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HISTORIC SECOND CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds 4those ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AUSTEN RIGGS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Renew Democracy Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds TROUT AND SALMON FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL25.8× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Richard and Mary L Gray Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Red Bird Hollow Foundation · The Gorter Family Foundation · Norwottock Charitable Trust · Francis Beidler Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Terra Foundation for American Art · Helen V Brach Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donnelley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donnelley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Out in the Open Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • The Lord's Place Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum: 0% of income from government
  • Historic Deerfield Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
  • Austen Riggs Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Donnelley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Donnelley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 299 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Donnelley’s filings →

More from the funding graph