Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donna L Kendall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$161k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.9MEducation$40kEnvironment$5kHuman Services$3kFood & Nutrition$846Civil Rights$800Animals$700Housing & Shelter$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $161k
$1,400
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY$161,000
ROYAL COLLEGE OF MUSIC$25,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN$25,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD$1,400
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$350
METROPOLITAN OPERA CLUB$250
NSCDA DUMBARTON HOUSE$100
AM SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION: $16k → 10%THE MASTERS SCHOOL: $1k → 9%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $350 → 17%NSCDA FRIENDS OF SULGRAVE MANOR: $1k → 14%THE MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM: $1k → 9%ALLIANCE FRANCAISE - CHICAGO: $5k → 14%NSCDA POWDER MAGAZINE: $500 → 6%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25k → 10%THE MASTERS SCHOOL: $1k → 9%THE SOLTI FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE MASTERS SCHOOL: $500 → 9%THE SOLTI FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $6k → 10%THE MASTERS SCHOOL: $500 → 9%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $2k → 17%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN: $50k → 14%ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE MASTERS SCHOOL: $500 → 9%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCGUILD: $2k → 17%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $35k → 14%THE MASTERS SCHOOL: $500 → 9%METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $2k → 17%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN: $25k → 14%THE MASTERS SCHOOL: $270 → 9%METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $1k → 17%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN: $25k → 14%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $1k → 17%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN: $25k → 14%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $163k → 10%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $1k → 17%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN: $25k → 14%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $161k → 10%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25k → 14%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $160k → 10%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $11k → 14%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $159k → 10%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $3k → 14%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $158k → 10%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 10%SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 10%SALVATION ARMY: $450 → 10%HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS COUNCIL: $500 → 10%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $303k → 10%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $138k → 10%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $132k → 10%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $125k → 10%IRVINE BARCLAY THEATER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
WY
CT
CA
VA
NM
NC
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Donna L Kendall Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 71%.

The Donna L Kendall Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 15 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$1.9M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+68%

Still filing today

60%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +16%
  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +58%
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $125k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • RP
    ROYAL PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA OF SCOTLAND
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IB
    IRVINE BARCLAY THEATER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FRANCAISE - CHICAGO
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
2
Hawaii Symphony Orchestra

To present the highest-quality performances of great music, bringing national and international distinction to the orchestra and its community; to delight and educate audiences of all ages and backgrounds, and enhance the cultural vitality…

Arts & Culture
3
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
4
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
5
Socal Symphony Society

The Culver City Symphony Orchestra strives to enlighten and inspire the diverse citizenry of Culver City and the Los Angeles area through the presentation of orchestral music concerts, to present works of American composers, and to…

Arts & Culture
6
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
7
New York City Opera

New york city opera was famously dubbed "the people's opera" by mayor fiorello laguardia at its founding in 1943. more than 80 years later, city opera continues its historic mission to inspire audiences with innovative and theatrically…

Arts & Culture
8
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
9
Chamber Opera of Chicago
—
10
Minnesota Orchestral Association

The minnesota orchestra mission is to enrich, inspire and serve our community as an enduring symphony orchestra internationally recognized for its artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
11
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
12
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Santa Fe Opera; the most unlike its peers is Masters School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1,498,149 · Arts & CulturePHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTYChicago Symphony Orchestra: $223,150 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony OrchestraTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $125,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERA+6 more: $40,230 · Arts & CultureROYAL COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $25,000 · OtherROYAL PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA OF SCOTLAND: $10,000 · OtherIRVINE BARCLAY THEATER: $5,000 · OtherALLIANCE FRANCAISE - CHICAGO: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherMASTERS SCHOOL: $4,270 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $3,300 · Other+11 more: $6,756 · OtherORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION: $35,600 · EducationTHE SOLTI FOUNDATION US CO Fiona Queen: $8,000 · PhilanthropyWYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL: $100 · Environment
Arts & Culture$1,886,529Other$64,326Education$35,600Philanthropy$8,000Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1,498,149 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $223,150 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $125,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION: $35,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $30,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOLTI FOUNDATION US CO Fiona Queen: $8,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMASTERS SCHOOL: $4,270 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORICAL COLLECTIONS COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA: $1,150 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN OPERA CLUB: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds THE SOLTI FOUNDATION US CO Fiona Queen ↗
  • Who funds The Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc ↗
  • Who funds MASTERS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN OPERA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donna L Kendall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donna L Kendall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Donna L Kendall Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Donna L Kendall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Donna L Kendall’s filings →

More from the funding graph