Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donald W Scott Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$181kRecreation & Sports$52kEducation$49kReligion$29kPhilanthropy$20kArts & Culture$19kHuman Services$10kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISU Foundation$50,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Union Health Foundation$2,500
Vigo County Education Foundation$1,000
First Congregational Church$1,000
Wabash Valley Family Sports Center$1,000
Swope Art Museum$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ISU Foundation: $50k → 19%Loyola University Health System: $121k → 14%Rose Hulman Institute of Technology: $40k → 19%Loyola University Health System: $20k → 14%Rose Hulman: $10k → 19%Loyola University Health System: $19k → 14%Rose Hulman: $10k → 19%St Joseph Church: $5k → 19%St Joseph University Parish: $5k → 19%St Joseph Church: $5k → 19%Garfield Purple Eagle Plaza: $5k → 19%Art Spaces: $3k → 19%St Joseph Church: $3k → 19%Vigo County Historical Society: $2k → 19%Vigo County Historical Society: $2k → 19%First Congregational Church: $2k → 19%Swope Art Museum: $2k → 19%Vigo County Education Foundation: $2k → 19%Childrens Museum: $2k → 19%Catholic Charities of Terre Haute: $2k → 19%Terre Haute Children's Museum: $2k → 19%Terre Haute Symphony: $2k → 19%First Congregational Church: $2k → 19%Terre Haute Symphony Association: $2k → 19%Catholic Charities of Terre Haute: $2k → 19%VC Education Foundation: $2k → 19%Catholic Charities of Terre Haute: $1k → 19%Terre Haute Symphony: $1k → 19%Swope Art Museum: $1k → 19%Vigo County Education Foundation: $1k → 19%Childrens Museum: $1k → 19%VC Education Foundation: $1k → 19%Vigo County Education Foundation: $1k → 19%Swope Art Museum: $1k → 19%First Congregational Church: $1k → 19%ISU Presidents Society: $2k → 19%Vigo County Historical Society: $1k → 19%ISU Presidents Society: $2k → 19%VNA Hospice: $5k → 19%Union Health Foundation: $3k → 19%VNA Hospice: $2k → 19%VNA Hospice: $2k → 19%Union Health Foundation: $2k → 19%Union Health Foundation: $2k → 19%VNA Hospice: $2k → 19%Carmelite Monastery: $2k → 19%Carmelite Monastery: $1k → 19%Carmelite Monastery: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The Donald W Scott Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Donald W Scott Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$308k · 16 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$308k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+17%

Still filing today

38%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2020–2022 · $161k · revenue +49%
  • CC
    Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $5k · revenue +34%
  • VC
    Vigo County Education Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • RI
    Rose-Hulman Institute of Technologygraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +51%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CHURCH TERRE HAUTE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • GP
    Garfield Purple Eagle Plaza
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tippecanoe County Historical Association

To enrich the lives of Tippecanoe County residents and visitors by collecting preserving researching and sharing our unique and diverse history

Arts & Culture
2
Terre Haute Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the Terre Haute Chamber of Commerce is to preserve, protect, and promote a business friendly envrionment free of obstacles to growth and development.

—
3
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
6
Terre Haute Boys & Girls Club

To provide recreational activities, programs, and supervision for boys and girls

Youth Development
7
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc

Advances the common good in the Wabash Valley by partnering with volunteers, companies and organizations to fund quality programs and initiatives in three core impact areas: Education, Health and Community Basics.

Philanthropy
9
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Paoli Hospital Foundation Inc

Provide philanthropic support to help provide services, equipment, resources and education for indiana university health paoli, inc. ("iu health paoli") to meet the healthcare needs of our community well into the future.

—
11
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wabash Valley Family Sports Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISU Foundation: $50,500 · OtherISU FoundationRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $40,000 · OtherRose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSt Joseph Church: $12,500 · OtherSt Joseph ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFirst Congregational Church: $7,000 · Other+15 more: $47,207 · Other+15 moreLOYOLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM: $160,590 · HealthLOYOLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMUNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 · HealthSheldon Swope Art Museum Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureTERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTerre Haute Symphony Association Inc: $2,000 · Arts & CultureWabash Valley Family Sports Center Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$189,207Health$169,090Arts & Culture$8,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM: $160,590 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVigo County Historical Society Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Terre Haute Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVigo County Education Foundation Inc: $4,200 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSheldon Swope Art Museum Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTerre Haute Symphony Association Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWabash Valley Family Sports Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF CENTRAL OHIO: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds UNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Vigo County Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Vigo County Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sheldon Swope Art Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds TERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Terre Haute Symphony Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wabash Valley Family Sports Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation IncIN20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc · Hulman & Company Foundation Inc · Indiana Chemical Trust Tr Ua-Fdt 320006018 · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · The Weston Wabash Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc · The Hux Family Charitable Trust · The George F and Marion D Johnson Charitable Trust · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Frederick R Benson Trust · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donald W Scott Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donald W Scott Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald W Scott’s filings →

    More from the funding graph