Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$140kHealth$92kReligion$49kHuman Services$34kArts & Culture$27kHousing & Shelter$24kRecreation & Sports$14kFood & Nutrition$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$938k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP$15,500
WNMU PUBLIC TV 13$4,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ESCANABA$4,000
SALVATION ARMY$4,000
TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR$3,000
MARQUETTE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$2,500
PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY$2,000
ESCANABA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,000
ESCANABA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,000
DELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE$2,000
FORTUNE LAKE LUTHERAN CAMP$2,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,200
BETHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
HOLY NAME CATHOLIC GRADE SCHOOL$1,000
BETHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $6k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $5k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $3k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $2k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $2k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $2k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$389k · 24 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$389k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+67%

Still filing today

33%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP
    8× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +65%
  • RA
    ROOM AT THE INN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $24k · revenue +15%
  • MS
    MARQUETTE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • CC
    COVANTAGE CARES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +36%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR DELTA COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware County Community College Educational Foundation

The delaware county community college educational foundation provides financial resources to assist the community college in achieving its mission to facilitate learning by providing quality educational programs and services that are…

Education
2
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
3
Clymer Library Association of Pocono Pines

Public library

—
4
Decatur Chamber of Commerce

Develop commerce in the city of decatur indiana

—
5
Mackinac Island Medical Center

To support funding of healthcare services for residents of mackinac island.

Health
6
Greater Baytown Chamber of Commerce

The baytown chamber of commerce is a business organization created to provide the leadership to enhance economic growth and a better quality of life for the baytown area.

—
7
Massachusetts Council of Community Hospitals Inc

Support the advocacy of community hospitals.

Health
8
Delta County Economic Development Alliance

Community development

Community Improvement
9
The Ishpeming Cancer Society Serving Marquette Co

Our all volunteer organization provides services to cancer patients who are unable to respond to the catastrophic health care costs caused by the disease and its treatment. we also sponsor prevention/early detection programs for citizens…

—
10
Eastern Shore Area Health Education Cent

To increase eastern shore access to quality health care by improving the supply and distribution of health care professionals through community/academic educational partnerships.

Health
11
Medical Care Access Coalition Inc

To promote cooperative medical services throughout marquette county and the upper peninsula of michigan that would provide a continuum of care for qualifying, uninsured, and/or under-insured persons.

—
12
Michigan West Coast Chamber of Commerce Foundation

Channels individual, member, and corporate gifts for benefit of community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Services of Delta County; the most unlike its peers is Eskymo Fan Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $65,500 · OtherBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMPESCANABA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $51,829 · OtherESCANABA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLSHOLY NAME CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL A CHESTERTON ACADEMY: $45,151 · OtherHOLY NAME CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL A CHESTERTON ACADEMYBETHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $34,033 · OtherBETHANY LUTHERAN CHURCHWNMU PUBLIC TV 13: $28,000 · OtherWNMU PUBLIC TV 13ESKY BAND BOOSTERS: $17,076 · OtherESKY BAND BOOSTERSSALVATION ARMY: $13,000 · Other+19 more: $59,600 · Other+19 moreROOM AT THE INN: $23,500 · Housing & ShelterTRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $4,000 · Human ServicesMARQUETTE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $20,100 · Arts & CultureDELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $12,500 · HealthESKYMO FAN CLUB: $10,150 · EducationCOVANTAGE CARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$314,189Housing & Shelter$23,500Human Services$21,000Arts & Culture$20,100Health$12,500Education$10,150Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $65,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetROOM AT THE INN: $23,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMARQUETTE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $20,100 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC: $17,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetDELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $12,500 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetESKYMO FAN CLUB: $10,150 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetCOVANTAGE CARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBAY DE NOC COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBR: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds ROOM AT THE INN ↗
  • Who funds MARQUETTE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ESKYMO FAN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds COVANTAGE CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BAY DE NOC COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward J Sackerson Charitable FoundationMI24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation · John and Melissa Besse Foundation · Robert & Jeanine Dagenais Foundation · Community Foundation of the Upper Peninsula · Daniel J Kobasic Foundation · Community Foundation of Marquette County · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald and Audrey Anderson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph