Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

John and Melissa Besse Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$357k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
31
Grants FY2025
23
Organizations funded FY2024
57%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$110,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 23
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$11M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 57% of the organizations John and Melissa Besse Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 90% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $464k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEmploymentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving29$347k34%
FY202423$518k57%
FY20239$327k22%
FY20226$51k50%
FY202122$182k45%
FY202015$222k73%
FY20194$652k25%
FY20189$893k89%
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.2MEducation$751kPublic Safety & Disaster$350kPublic Benefit$311kEnvironment$188kArts & Culture$126kHuman Services$99kHealth$85kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Michigan Tech Fund$450,00021%
City of Gladstone$308,8002n/a
Chassell Historical Organization Inc$55,1201n/a
Marquette City Band Inc$45,000110%
Pregnancy Services of Delta County$43,00054%
Tri-County Safe Harbor Inc$27,00051%
Hancock Trails Club$25,0001n/a
United Way of Delta County$25,00045%
Bay Cliff Health Camp$20,00020%
Lakestate Industries$16,00040%
Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of John and Melissa Besse Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Michigan Tech Fund$450,00021%
City of Gladstone$308,8002n/a
Chassell Historical Organization Inc$55,1201n/a
Marquette City Band Inc$45,000110%
Pregnancy Services of Delta County$43,00054%
Tri-County Safe Harbor Inc$27,00051%
Hancock Trails Club$25,0001n/a
United Way of Delta County$25,00045%
Bay Cliff Health Camp$20,00020%
Lakestate Industries$16,00040%
Trees for Tomorrow Inc$16,00061%
Holy Name Catholic High School a Chesterton Academy$15,0004n/a
Fortune Lake Lutheran Camp Assoc Inc$15,0003n/a
Salvation Army$15,0002n/a
The Northern Michigan University Foundation$10,00020%
Aquafest Inc$7,00014%
Superior Health Foundation$5,00010%
Delta County Cancer Alliance Inc$5,0001n/a
Shepherds Watch Community Center Inc$3,0001n/a
Barron County Pro Rodeo Inc$2,50011%
Ice Age Trail Alliance Inc$2,50010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 40 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.4M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget John and Melissa Besse Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMichigan Tech Fund: $450,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMarquette City Band Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetPregnancy Services of Delta County: $43,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetTri-County Safe Harbor Inc: $27,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetUnited Way of Delta County: $25,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetBay Cliff Health Camp: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLakestate Industries: $16,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTrees for Tomorrow Inc: $16,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetThe Northern Michigan University Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAquafest Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSuperior Health Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBarron County Pro Rodeo Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetIce Age Trail Alliance Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Donald and Audrey Anderson FoundationMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation · Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation · Robert & Jeanine Dagenais Foundation · Community Foundation of the Upper Peninsula · Superior Health Foundation · The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation · Community Foundation of Marquette County · West End Health Foundation · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Flagstar Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare John and Melissa Besse Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John and Melissa Besse Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John and Melissa Besse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About John and Melissa Besse Foundation

How much does John and Melissa Besse Foundation give?
John and Melissa Besse Foundation reported 31 grants totaling $356,850 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 23 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does John and Melissa Besse Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (36%), Education (21%), Public Safety & Disaster (10%).
Who are John and Melissa Besse Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Michigan Tech Fund ($450k), City of Gladstone ($309k), Chassell Historical Organization Inc ($55k).
Does John and Melissa Besse Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 57% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does John and Melissa Besse Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as John and Melissa Besse Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation, Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation, Robert & Jeanine Dagenais Foundation.
Where is John and Melissa Besse Foundation based?
John and Melissa Besse Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Melissa Besse’s filings →

More from the funding graph