Skip to content

· Public charity

The Dominguez Dream in Memory of H Frank Dominguez

To support and foster education and health, through the making of grants and distributions for charitable or educational purposes.

$134k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$651k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $128,854, the rows itemized in this filing. The $134,380 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,526 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
$11,084
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAS PALMAS (TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT)$35,376
DEL PASO HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT)$19,269
H FRANK DOMINGUEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$12,677
LAUREL ELEMENTARY (OCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT)$11,990
20TH STREET ELEMENTARY$11,084
OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY OF TALPA SCHOOL$8,597
ST ODILIA SCHOOL$8,144
ST PHILOMENE SCHOOL$7,625
BRET HARTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$7,469
JUAN FELIPE HERRERA ELEMENTARY$6,623
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MADISON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 11%TYRRELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $25k → 10%OCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $31k → 11%DEL PASO HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT): $19k → 12%H F DOMINGUEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $40k → 14%MOTHER OF SORROWS SCHOOL: $19k → 14%JUAN FELIPE HERRERA ELEMENTARY: $7k → 19%MADISON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 11%OCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $14k → 11%ST PHILOMENE SCHOOL: $33k → 12%SBCUSDDOMINGUEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $25k → 14%MOTHER OF SORROWS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $15k → 14%LAUREL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $13k → 11%ST PHILOMENE SCHOOL: $12k → 12%H FRANK DOMINGUEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $13k → 14%20TH STREET ELEMENTARY: $29k → 14%LAUREL ELEMENTARY (OCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT): $12k → 11%ST PHILOMENE SCHOOL: $10k → 12%HOLY ROSARY SCHOOL: $6k → 14%ST ODILIA: $14k → 14%LAUREL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $9k → 11%ST PHILOMENE SCHOOL: $8k → 12%OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY OF TALPA SCHOOL: $11k → 14%LAUREL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5k → 11%ST PHILOMENE SCHOOL: $8k → 12%20TH STREET ELEMENTARY: $12k → 14%NORALTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $46k → 12%OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY OF TALPA SCHOOL: $9k → 14%LAS PALMAS (TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT): $35k → 12%20TH STREET ELEMENTARY: $11k → 14%LAS PALMAS: $15k → 12%OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY OF TALPA SCHOOL: $5k → 14%NORALTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $8k → 12%ST ODILIA SCHOOL: $8k → 14%LAS PALMAS: $7k → 12%BRET HARTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $17k → 12%BRET HARTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $12k → 12%BRET HARTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $7k → 12%BRET HARTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $6k → 12%SACRAMENTO NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$590k · 11 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$590k
$54k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    5× · 2018–2024 · $124k
  • SB
    SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    3× · 2018–2024 · $78k
  • PO
    PASTOR OF ST PHILOMENE PARISH - SACRAMENTO A CORPORATION SOLE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $71k

Funded once

  • HU
    HAYWARD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • 2S
    20TH STREET ELEMENTARY
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $124,271 · OtherTWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $78,222 · OtherSAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTPASTOR OF ST PHILOMENE PARISH - SACRAMENTO A CORPORATION SOLE: $70,555 · OtherPASTOR OF ST PHILOMENE PARISH - SACRAMENTO A CORPORATION SOLEMADISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $60,000 · OtherMADISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICTOCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $44,239 · OtherOCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $42,602 · OtherSACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $40,084 · OtherLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTOCEANSIDE HIGH SCHOOL: $39,096 · OtherOCEANSIDE HIGH SCHOOLOUR LADY OF ROSARY OF THE TALPA SCHOOL: $34,429 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SCHOOL: $33,845 · OtherHAYWARD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $24,836 · OtherST ODILIA SCHOOL: $22,347 · Other+5 more: $36,248 · Other+5 more
Other$650,774

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GenYOUTH IncorporatedIL13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GenYOUTH Incorporated · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dominguez Dream in Memory of H Frank Dominguez’s filings →

More from the funding graph