· Public charity
The Dominguez Dream in Memory of H Frank Dominguez
To support and foster education and health, through the making of grants and distributions for charitable or educational purposes.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of THE DOMINGUEZ DREAM IN MEMORY OF H FRANK DOMINGUEZ’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $128,854 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $134,380 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,526 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAS PALMAS (TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT) | $35,376 |
| DEL PASO HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT) | $19,269 |
| H FRANK DOMINGUEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $12,677 |
| LAUREL ELEMENTARY (OCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT) | $11,990 |
| 20TH STREET ELEMENTARY | $11,084 |
| OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY OF TALPA SCHOOL | $8,597 |
| ST ODILIA SCHOOL | $8,144 |
| ST PHILOMENE SCHOOL | $7,625 |
| BRET HARTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $7,469 |
| JUAN FELIPE HERRERA ELEMENTARY | $6,623 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT5× · 2018–2024 · $124k
- SBSAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT3× · 2018–2024 · $78k
- POPASTOR OF ST PHILOMENE PARISH - SACRAMENTO A CORPORATION SOLE6× · 2018–2024 · $71k
Funded once
- HUHAYWARD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2018 · $25k
- 2S20TH STREET ELEMENTARYone grant, 2021 · $12k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2018–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: GenYOUTH Incorporated · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.