Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Doherty Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2018
13
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Doherty Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Servant Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Doherty Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $67k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’18
3
’19
1
’20
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Human Services$92kReligion$38kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$1kHousing & Shelter$1kHealth$500Recreation & Sports$500
02FY2018 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k10 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAPTIST GENERAL ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA$20,000
MARYS SHELTER INC$15,495
MARYS SHELTER INC$15,193
PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADYOF GUADALUPE$5,000
HOLY CROSS ACADEMY$3,000
MARYS SHELTER INC$2,500
PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADYOF GUADALUPE$2,000
VIRGINIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS$1,000
DOCTOR YUM PROJECT$1,000
LOISANNS HOPE HOUSE$1,000
FREDERICKSBURG PREGNANCY CENTER$500
KAREN FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL BASEBALL CAMP FOR A CURE I$500
FREDERICKSBURG ACADEMY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADYOF GUADALUPE: $10k → 10%MARYS SHELTER INC: $31k → 15%PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADYOF GUADALUPE: $5k → 10%MARYS SHELTER INC: $15k → 15%PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADYOF GUADALUPE: $2k → 10%MARYS SHELTER INC: $15k → 15%MARYS SHELTER INC: $3k → 15%LOISANNS HOPE HOUSE: $1k → 15%MARYS SHELTER INC: $750 → 15%FREDERICKSBURG PREGNANCY CENTER: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 3 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +104% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$112k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+104%
+42%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Mary's Shelter Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $65k · revenue +104%
  • BG
    BAPTIST GENERAL ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA
    2× · 2018–2020 · $30k
  • TP
    THE PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $17k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • E
    EMPOWERHOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +42%
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • VC
    VIRGINIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
2
The Elizabeth House Maternity Home

Crisis Pregnancy Center

Human Services
3
Marthas House of Hope Inc

Martha's House of Hope is a non-profit organization, founded by Roman Catholic individuals committed to providing shelter, life skills and hope to pregnant mothers and their babies; to strive for lives of self-reliance, a sense of service…

Health
4
Marys Houseof Louisiana Inc

Mary's house is a non-profit pregnancy care center funded by contributions, offering any pregnant woman early access to medical care, emotional and spiritual encouragement. mary's house facilitates resources already available in the…

Health
5
The Sparrows Nest Maternity Home

We are a Christ-centered residential care facility for pregnant women in crisis. We offer a safe home that provides shelter, food, prenatal/postpartum care, spiritual, mental, financial, rides to medical appointments, educational and…

Human Services
6
Annie's Home

Annies home is a caring community that empowers pregant and parenting women to take positive and effective action on behalf of themselves and their children by providing physical, emotional, spiritual, and professional support.

Human Services
7
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services
8
Visitation House Inc

Grounded in the gospel and in the culture of life of the catholic church, visition house is a home that welcomes women in crisis pregnancies in the spirit of elizabeth, who welcomed her cousin the virgin mary with awe-filled joy and true…

Human Services
9
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
10
Lighthouse Ministries Inc

Provide a home and care for unwed pregnant girls

Religion
11
Mary's Shelter of the Treasure Coast Inc

Mary's home seeks to provide a faith-based transitional pathway leading expectant women and new mothers to a life of self-sufficiency and dignity for themselves and their babies.

Housing & Shelter
12
Home for Homeless Women
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empowerhouse; the most unlike its peers is Mary's Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mary's Shelter Inc: $64,928 · Human ServicesMary's Shelter IncTHE PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE: $17,000 · Human ServicesTHE PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPEEMPOWERHOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWERHOUSE+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesBAPTIST GENERAL ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA: $30,000 · OtherBAPTIST GENERAL ASSOCIATION …HOLY CROSS ACADEMY: $3,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS ACADEMY+2 more: $1,500 · OtherServant Foundation: $8,070 · ReligionThe Doctor Yum Project: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFREDERICKSBURG ACADEMY: $250 · Education
Human Services$93,428Other$34,500Religion$8,070Food & Nutrition$1,000Education$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMary's Shelter Inc: $64,928 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetTHE PAUL STEFAN FOUNDATION OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE: $17,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetEMPOWERHOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetServant Foundation: $8,070 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Doctor Yum Project: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFredericksburg Pregnancy Center: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG ACADEMY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Rappahannock River Region IncVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Rappahannock River Region Inc · McCommons Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Doherty Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Doherty Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Doherty Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph