Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dixon Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$253k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$202k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$1.2MEducation$135kReligion$92kHuman Services$30kPhilanthropy$3kCivil Rights$3kArts & Culture$2kRecreation & Sports$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $202k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UAB DEPARTMENT OF PEDATRICS$201,511
VESTAVIA HILLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,100
CAMP SMILE-A-MILE$5,100
DANIELS DRIVE$5,000
TIMES OUT INC$5,000
ALABAMA GAME CHANGERS$5,000
DOUBLE OAK COMMUNITY CHURCH MT LAUREL$5,000
SHINE ON UNIVERSITY$2,500
ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,500
RESOLVE- FIGHT FOR ALABAMA FAMILIES$2,500
OUR LADY OF ASSUMPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,500
ASHFORD PARK SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,500
ALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL$1,500
GATEWAY$1,000
CAMP TWIN LAKES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%SPECIAL EQUESTRIANS: $100 → 7%TIMES OUT INC: $5k → 16%TIMES OUT INC: $5k → 16%TIMES OUT INC: $5k → 16%TIMES OUT INC: $5k → 16%TIMES OUT INC: $5k → 16%TIMES OUT INC: $4k → 16%GATEWAY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 10 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$1.4M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+168%

Still filing today

20%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UD
    UAB DEPARTMENT OF PEDATRICS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $738k
  • UD
    UAB DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRICS
    2× · 2019–2020 · $372k
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $125k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • UD
    UAB DEPT OF NEUROLOGY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • UG
    UAB GRAY HUNTINGTON DISEASE RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • AC
    ASPERGER CONNECTION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
2
Autism Opportunities Foundation

We improve the lives of the people in our care affected by autism.

Health
3
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
4
Autism Partnership Foundation

Advancing effective methodology and behavior analytic treatment to improve outcomes of individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

Human Services
5
St Luke's Community Health Services

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
6
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
7
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
9
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
10
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
11
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
12
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Harbor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Times Out Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UAB DEPARTMENT OF PEDATRICS: $738,409 · OtherUAB DEPARTMENT OF PEDATRICSUAB DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRICS: $372,247 · OtherUAB DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRICSVESTAVIA HILLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $60,100 · Other+21 more: $100,500 · Other+21 moreAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationAUBURN UN…+1 more: $2,500 · EducationSMILE-A-MILE: $35,300 · HealthAlabama Game Changers: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $600 · HealthTimes Out Inc: $28,500 · Human ServicesGateway: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $200 · Human ServicesALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,271,256Education$127,500Health$40,900Human Services$29,700Arts & Culture$1,500Recreation & Sports$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE-A-MILE: $35,300 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTimes Out Inc: $28,500 over 6y, 17% of budgetAlabama Game Changers: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASHFORD PARK SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGateway: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HARBOR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Equestrians Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION THE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE-A-MILE ↗
  • Who funds Times Out Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alabama Game Changers ↗
  • Who funds ASHFORD PARK SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds Gateway ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Equestrians Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION THE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Protective Life Foundation · The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dixon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dixon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Dixon Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Dixon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dixon’s filings →

More from the funding graph