Skip to content

· Public charity

The Dickey Foundation

The foundation supports local law enforcement, firefighters, and their families who put their lives on the line every day, serving the public.

$143k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$122kCrime & Legal$37kRecreation & Sports$26kHuman Services$20kEnvironment$16kEmployment$11kPublic Benefit$8kHealth$7k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $142,763 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $132,763 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$278k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Assist the Officer$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Firefighter Cancer Support Network: $10k → 14%DPAS Assist The Officer Foundation: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
MI
NV
CA
CO
AZ
NC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unite Nationwide for Cops Under Fire Foundation Aka Uncuff the Innocent
Crime & Legal
2
Fraternal Order of Police

Fraternal group for Officers legal and labor issues.

—
3
Idaho Falls Fraternal Order of Police Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
4
Massachusetts Corps of Fire Chaplains
Public Safety & Disaster
5
Racine Firefighters Association

The Racine Firefighters Association is a part of the Racine Volunteer Fire Department.

Public Benefit
6
Los Angeles Retired Fire and Police Benevolent Association
Crime & Legal
7
Hokah Firefighters Assn Inc

Support hokah fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Monroe County Professinal Firefight
Public Safety & Disaster
9
Concerns of Police Survivors

Support for families of officers lost

—
10
Fraternal Order of Police 25 Western Cuyahoga Lodge

Support law officers, active and retired

—
11
Leesburg Police Dept Sfd Pf(1453)
—
12
Virginia Professional Fire Fighters
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Police Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Marianna Police Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Collin County Fire College Extractors: $20,000 · OtherCollin County Fire College ExtractorsOthers under 5K: $17,650 · OtherOthers under 5KIndividual grant recipient: $15,760 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOthers under threshold reporting: $11,056 · OtherCelina Fire Dept: $10,000 · OtherAssist the Officer: $10,000 · OtherNorthwest Fire District: $9,952 · OtherDundee Volunteer Fire Dept: $9,575 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,028 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,026 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,742 · OtherLas Vegas Metro PD: $7,800 · OtherStation 9 Savannah Fire Dept: $7,685 · OtherLas Vegas Metropolitan Police Department: $7,680 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,651 · Other+9 more: $64,057 · Other+9 moreDPAS ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesDPAS ASSI…FIREFIGHTER CANCER SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFIREFIGHT…
Other$225,662Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDPAS ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFIREFIGHTER CANCER SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DPAS ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIREFIGHTER CANCER SUPPORT NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dickey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dickey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dickey Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Dickey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dickey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph