Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Devlin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$56kFood & Nutrition$23kPhilanthropy$13kHuman Services$12kHealth$10kArts & Culture$6kRecreation & Sports$6kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$600
Median grant
4
States reached
$590k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
SHERIDAN CO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION$5,000
THE LORD'S DINER$5,000
CEREBRAL PALSEY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE KANSAS WIDLIFE EXHIBIT$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
EMPORIA EXPRESS SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,000
MUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FIRST TEE GREATER WICHITA$1,000
HOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC CHURCH & ACADEMY$600
ELK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
GUADELUPE CLINIC$500
CENTRAL KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $600 → 11%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $350 → 11%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $350 → 11%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $250 → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $125 → 16%STARKEY: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
NV
IA
VA
KS
TN
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$103k · 21 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
27

Total granted

$103k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+22%

Still filing today

52%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +68%
  • GC
    GREENWOOD COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +24%
  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    3× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Augusta
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -21%
  • AA
    AUGUSTA AMERICAN LEGION POST 189
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
2
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy
3
Kansas Land Trust Inc

To protect and preserve lands of natural, ecological, scenic, historic, agricultural, or recreational significance in kansas.

Environment
4
Guadalupe Health Foundation

To support, assist and promote the interests and welfare of the programs and activities of the catholic diocese of wichita which provide health care services and health education to poor, distressed and underprivileged individuals.

5
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
6
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
7
Kansas Newspaper Foundation

To preserve the legacy and to ensure and advance the prominence of kansas newspapers and the communities they faithfully serve.

Community Improvement
8
Kansas Food Bank Foundation Inc

To serve as a fundraising and support organization for the kansas foodbank warehouse, inc.

Food & Nutrition
9
Kansas City Museum Foundation Inc

The kansas city museum foundation preserves, interprets, and celebrates kansas city through collections, exhibitions, and bold programs that reflect the city's evolution and spirit, and engage visitors in unfolding stories about kansas…

Arts & Culture
10
Kansas Health Institute

Improve the health of all kansans through nonpartisan research, education and engagement that support effective policymaking.

Science & Tech
11
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
12
Kansas Children's Foundation

The kansas children's foundation is dedicated to providing resources including financial and emotional support to children and families across the state of kansas.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Timothy P O'shaughnessy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and Shelter S…Disability Services & Rehab…Rural Healthcare ProvidersFamily Philanthropic Founda…Christian Community Develop…Arts & Culture OrganizationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsEducational Institution Sup…Kansas Industry & Advocacy …Community Health & Social S…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr15%12%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr14%12%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%3%<5yr15%5%5–10yr18%22%10–20yr14%6%20–35yr14%10%35–55yr16%55%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
13%
1,070/8,465

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · OtherWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITYWSU FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherWSU FOUNDATIONTHE LORD'S DINER — $20,000 · OtherTHE LORD'S DINERSHERIDAN CO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherSHERIDAN CO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCity of Augusta — $5,000 · OtherAUGUSTA AMERICAN LEGION POST 189 — $5,000 · Other+36 more — $35,301 · Other+36 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME — $2,125 · Human ServicesCAMP WOOD YMCA INC — $1,550 · Human ServicesSTARKEY INC — $500 · Human ServicesCOSMOSPHERE INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE — $1,300 · Arts & CultureORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD — $1,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS SPORTS HALL OF FAME — $250 · Arts & CultureTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Public BenefitGREENWOOD COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,570 · HealthHOPENET INC — $550 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 · HealthClub Parkinsons Inc — $250 · HealthTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC — $3,000 · Science & TechMUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationCHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC — $250 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $250 · EducationTIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION — $200 · Education
Other$125,301Human Services$9,175Arts & Culture$5,050Public Benefit$5,000Health$3,870Science & Tech$3,000Education$1,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWOOD COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,570 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCOSMOSPHERE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME — $2,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC — $1,800 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP WOOD YMCA INC — $1,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE — $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA KANSAS — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGuadalupe Clinic Inc — $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPENET INC — $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Kansas Community Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARKEY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmpowering Minds International Inc — $300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRanchland Trust of Kansas Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICT FOOD RESCUE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPASSAGEWAYS LTD — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS SPORTS HALL OF FAME — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE ARCHER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION FOR LITERACY — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK FORK COALITION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds THE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC
  • Who funds GREENWOOD COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COSMOSPHERE INC
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
  • Who funds DEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds CAMP WOOD YMCA INC
  • Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE
  • Who funds KANSAS HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA KANSAS
  • Who funds MUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD
  • Who funds Guadalupe Clinic Inc
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC
  • Who funds HOPENET INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita FoundationKS38.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · United Way of the Plains Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Ima Foundation · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · Deboer Foundation Inc · Belin Foundation · Bruce G Cochener Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Devlin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Tall Timbers Research Inc10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Devlin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Devlin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph