Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dennis a and Julia M Watkins Foundation Inc

The Dennis A.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$63kScience & Tech$47kCivil Rights$40kHealth$13kRecreation & Sports$12kSocial Science$10kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$3,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$335k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORDER OF SOCIAL WORKERS IN ALBANIA$45,176
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$5,000
ALEXANDRIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$3,600
WELLSPRING$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF INDIANA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 29% of grant dollars ($58k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 71% that went abroad ($141k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION IN: $3k → 9%COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION IN: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 71% of all-years giving ($141k)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Bosnia and Herzegovina$54k · 3 grants
Bulgaria$45k · 2 grants
Serbia$30k · 1 grant
Croatia$12k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 6 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$67k
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+22%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WELLSPRING INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +3%
  • EP
    ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +41%
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BA
    BULGARIAN ASSN OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCA
    one grant, 2024 · $43k
  • FC
    FOUNDATION CURE
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR RESEARCH
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
2
Washington State Employees Credit Union

To provide services to members which are mandated in the credit union act to charters and to provide a means whereby members can provide each other with needed financial services.

—
3
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
6
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
7
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Social Science Research Council

The social science research council is an independent, international nonprofit organization. it fosters innovative research, nurtures new generations of social scientists, and deepens how inquiry is practiced within and across disciplines.

Social Science
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carpenter's Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Maine Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORDER OF SOCIAL WORKERS IN ALBANIA: $45,176 · OtherORDER OF SOCIAL WORKERS IN ALBANIABULGARIAN ASSN OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCA: $43,000 · OtherBULGARIAN ASSN OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCAFOUNDATION CURE: $40,200 · OtherFOUNDATION CURECENTER FOR RESEARCH: $30,000 · OtherCENTER FOR RESEARCHUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHUNIVERSITY OF SARAJEVO: $14,097 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SARAJEVOIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAlexandria Symphony Orchestra: $10,200 · Other+3 more: $8,020 · OtherWELLSPRING INC: $14,000 · HealthECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $10,120 · Social ScienceUNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Maine Foundation: $2,000 · EducationCOUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION: $4,000 · Human ServicesLEGAL AID CHICAGO: $1,000 · Crime & LegalCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$217,693Health$14,000Social Science$10,120Education$7,000Human Services$4,000Crime & Legal$1,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWELLSPRING INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAlexandria Symphony Orchestra: $10,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $10,120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maine Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID CHICAGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELLSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds Alexandria Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Maine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER'S SHELTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dennis a and Julia M Watkins Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dennis a and Julia M Watkins Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dennis a and Julia M Watkins’ filings →

    More from the funding graph