Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Demos Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.5MHealth$453kReligion$387kRecreation & Sports$190kPublic Safety & Disaster$120kHuman Services$107kEducation$94kAnimals$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SURGICORP INTERNATIONAL$150,000
NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER$35,000
THE RADAR PROJECT - A CHILD'S LIGHT$30,000
THE RADAR PROJECT$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$5,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL$5,000
ST MARTIN DE PORRES CHURCH$5,000
ST EDMONDS HOME FOR CHILDREN$3,000
BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC$2,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION FOUNDATION$1,000
ANGEL FLIGHT EAST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $5k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $5k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $5k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $5k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $5k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $5k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $5k → 14%BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
VA
MD
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 34 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
7

Total granted

$2.9M
$38k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +27% · 47% of their budget
  • NA
    NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +84%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    4× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • SK
    ST KATHERINE OF SIENA ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • SA
    ST ANN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IC
    IHM CENTER FOR LITERACY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
3
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
4
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
5
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc

St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…

Health
6
Luminis Health Inc

Support and encourage quality health care, medical, and related services across anne arundel, prince george's, calvert, queen anne's, and talbot and kent counties, by among other activities, conducting fundraising and other operations for…

Health
7
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
8
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
9
Sancta Maria Hospital Inc

Faithful to the spirit of the congregation of the daughters of mary, sancta maria nursing facility's mission is to witness christ's compassion, caring and love, reflecting the catholic church's role in the continuation of christ's healing…

—
10
International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology Inc

The organization provides peer reviewed scientific research and education in the field of biological dentistry.

Health
11
American Board of Medical Specialties

In collaboration with its member boards, abms creates standards for board certification for physicians and medical specialists. specifically, for initial and continuing certification. abms and its member boards establish rigorous standards…

—
12
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL: $1,450,000 · InternationalSURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL+1 more: $40,000 · InternationalST KATHERINE OF SIENA CHURCH: $216,500 · OtherST KATHERINE OF SIENA CHURCHTHE RADAR PROJECT - A CHILD'S LIGHT: $150,000 · OtherTHE RADAR PROJECT - A CHILD'S LI…SHRINE OF CZESTOCHOWA ORDER OF ST PAUL THE FIRST HERMIT: $60,000 · OtherSHRINE OF CZESTOCHOWA ORDER OF S…CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $60,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESAMERICAN RED CROSS: $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSST MARTIN DE PORRES CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherST MARTIN DE PORRES CHURCHCATHOLIC CHARITY APPEAL: $37,500 · OtherNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $40,000 · Other+20 more: $153,500 · Other+20 moreTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $120,000 · HealthTHE CHILD…SIMON'S FUND: $80,000 · HealthSIMON'S F…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE C…+1 more: $7,000 · HealthNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $180,000 · Recreation & SportsANGEL FLIGHT EAST: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsINDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS: $80,000 · EducationLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $35,000 · Human ServicesBEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesA CHILD'S LIGHT: $35,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $8,000 · Philanthropy
International$1,490,000Other$822,500Health$232,000Recreation & Sports$190,000Education$80,000Human Services$49,000Philanthropy$43,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL: $1,450,000 over 9y, 47% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $180,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON'S FUND: $80,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetA CHILD'S LIGHT: $35,000 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT EAST: $10,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMAMA'S KITCHEN: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDUQUESNE CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds SIMON'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds A CHILD'S LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT RETIREMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT EAST ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA11.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Demos Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Demos Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Demos Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Demos Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Demos Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph