· Private foundation
The Delaski Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $704k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EDUCATION DESIGN LAB (EDL) | $400,000 |
| LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH | $120,000 |
| YEAR UP INC | $100,000 |
| CITYWORKS DC | $100,000 |
| FILM2FUTURE | $100,000 |
| SITAR ARTS CENTER | $80,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $80,000 |
| SKILLUP COALITION | $75,000 |
| COLORADO SUCCEEDS | $75,000 |
| CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA | $75,000 |
| SHADOW PROJECT | $70,000 |
| SIGNATURE THEATER | $70,000 |
| WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST | $55,000 |
| HAITI EDUCATION MISSION INC | $50,000 |
| LOUDOUN SERENITY HOUSE | $50,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $830k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.
67 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $697k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- EDEDUCATION DESIGN LAB5× · 2017–2021 · $2.5M · revenue +980% · 31% of their budget
- TCTHE CENTER FOR MIND-BODY MEDICINE8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +199%
- LPLOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC8× · 2017–2024 · $700k · revenue +201%
Funded once
- NANATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZERSone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -4%
- ASAMERICA SUCCEEDSgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +106%
- PCPIMA COUNTY CC DISTRICTone grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.
Higher education shapes the future of every community in america-determining who moves up the economic ladder, where good jobs develop, and how regions prosper. this promise depends on the public's ability to see and understand how their…
See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…
To ensure college and career success for high-potential students from low-income backgrounds, and through our efforts help build diverse, equitable, and vibrant communities. we do this through a comprehensive model of financial aid and…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
How this is measured
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EDUCATION DESIGN LAB ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR MIND-BODY MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHADOW PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FILM2FUTURE ↗
- Who funds SITAR ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PERSONAL TRANSFORMATION AND COURAGE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST ↗
- Who funds EDFUEL ↗
- Who funds PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Brave Trails ↗
- Who funds High Desert Food & Farm Alliance ↗
- Who funds WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ECOTRUST ↗
- Who funds NEW FUTURES ↗
- Who funds THE WASHINGTON BALLET ↗
- Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Succeeds ↗
- Who funds THE PREM RAWAT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SANTA YNEZ VALLEY FAMILY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Loudoun Serenity House ↗
- Who funds Cascades Academy of Central Oregon ↗
- Who funds Northern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds CITYWORKS DC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZERS ↗
- Who funds REACH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds AYUDA INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON BRAVO YOUTH ORCHESTRAS ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Walton Family Foundation Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Gates Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Delaski Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Delaski Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- High Desert Food & Farm Alliance: 45% of income from government
- Heart of Oregon Corps Inc: 28% of income from government
- Warm Springs Community Action Team: 28% of income from government
- Upper Deschutes Watershed Council: 25% of income from government
- Kairospdx: 19% of income from government
- Friends of the Children- Central Oregon: 16% of income from government
- Ecotrust: 14% of income from government
- The Shadow Project: 8% of income from government
- Bienestar Inc: 8% of income from government
- Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Delaski Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Delaski Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Delaski Family’s filings →