Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dear Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$60kEnvironment$33kHuman Services$20kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THRIVE DC$10,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION$10,000
ADKINS ARBORETUM$10,000
CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE$10,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$10,000
PROJECT GIVEBACK COMMUNITY SERVICE ORG$5,000
FATHER MCKENNA CENTER$5,000
PHILLIPS WHARF ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%PROJECT GIVEBACK COMMUNITY SERVICE ORG: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
3
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
4
Tyonek Tribal Conservation District

To conserve, enhance, and encourage the wise use of natural resources. ttcd's core values are to meet the needs of our stakeholders and to foster cooperative relationships.

Environment
5
Western Sustainability Exchange

Advancing sustainability in the western area of the united states through a series of programs and activities designed to promote better ranching practices. a strong focus is to provide ranchers with the information, tools, technical…

Environment
6
Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc)

Community gardening, land conservation and environmental education are the primary activities. the community gardening program assists in development and maintenance of gardens with materials and neighborhood outreach. the land program…

Environment
7
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
8
Harry R Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology

The Center brings together diverse interests from the agricultural, forestry, and environmental communities for the purpose of retaining Maryland's working landscapes and the industries they support while protecting and improving the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.

Food & Nutrition
10
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
11
Healthy Chesapeake Inc

Healthy chesapeake is committed to building a culture of wellness that supports, sustains and advocates for a healthier chesapeake. to achieve this, healthy chesapeake recognizes that health and well-being are interconnected with social,…

Health
12
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chesapeake Wildlife Heritage Inc; the most unlike its peers is Adkins Arboretum Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INCTHRIVE DC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHRIVE DCTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INCSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE …THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE…ADKINS ARBORETUM LTD: $10,000 · EnvironmentADKINS ARBORETUM LT…Phillips Wharf Environmental Center Inc: $2,500 · EnvironmentPhillips Wharf Envi…RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesRED WIGGLER …PROJECT GIVEBACK COMMUNITY SERVICE ORG: $5,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT GIVE…
Food & Nutrition$65,000Other$30,000Environment$22,500Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE DC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetADKINS ARBORETUM LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT GIVEBACK COMMUNITY SERVICE ORG: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPhillips Wharf Environmental Center Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dear Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dear Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Phillips Wharf Environmental Center Inc: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Dear Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Dear Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dear’s filings →

More from the funding graph