Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Davis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$547k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$1.0MInternational$803kEnvironment$417kReligion$390kScience & Tech$310kArts & Culture$299kHealth$223kRecreation & Sports$170kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $436k
$9,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN AND MACHINE COGNITION INC$200,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME$100,000
SEASIDE INSTITUTE$84,000
SEA SHUL INC$52,000
PARKING REFORM NETWORK$22,000
INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC$20,000
THE NATURE SCHOOL COOPERATIVE$15,000
MENTOR$10,000
FRIENDS OF LAGUNA SECA INC$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$9,000
MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST$5,000
THE CHAPEL AT SEASIDE$5,000
SMART GROWTH AMERICA$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE$2,500
KQED INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SEASIDE AGIN WITH GRACE: $60k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of The Davis Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Davis Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 39 repeat orgs$692k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
59

Total granted

$3.2M
$435k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+25%

Still filing today

59%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $257k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME
    7× · 2017–2025 · $775k · revenue +77%
  • SI
    SEASIDE INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $397k · revenue +36% · 58% of their budget
  • PW
    Point Washington Medical Clinic Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $190k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SA
    SEASIDE AGING WITH GRACE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · 100% of their budget
  • IT
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • II
    ITIC - INT'L TRANSPORTATION INNOVATION CTR
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
California Academy of Sciences

The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

Arts & Culture
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
7
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
9
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
10
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Pacific Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Center for Applied Transect Stu. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/52
Grantees still filing
34/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEASIDE INSTITUTE: $576,001 · OtherSEASIDE INSTITUTESEASIDE INSTITUTE INC: $397,000 · OtherSEASIDE INSTITUTE INCSEASIDE INTERFAITH CHAPEL INC: $235,500 · OtherSEASIDE INTERFAITH CHAPEL INCSEA SHUL INC: $139,000 · OtherSEA SHUL INCICAA: $80,700 · Other+74 more: $740,192 · Other+74 moreAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $775,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ACADEMY IN R…THE CENTER FOR APPLIED TRANSECT STU: $310,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CENTE…Cambodian Childrens Fund: $28,000 · PhilanthropyCambodian…+2 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $152,500 · EducationTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $67,000 · EducationTHE NATURE SCHOOL INC: $25,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Education+3 more: $3,600 · EducationPoint Washington Medical Clinic Inc: $190,000 · HealthFANT MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Health+3 more: $5,800 · HealthFlorida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Inc: $200,000 · Science & TechSCENIC WALTON INC: $35,000 · EnvironmentPARKING REFORM NETWORK: $22,000 · EnvironmentSMART GROWTH AMERICA: $20,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $11,000 · EnvironmentNOKUSE EDUCATION INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE NATURE SCHOOL: $5,000 · Environment1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC: $4,000 · Environment+1 more: $2,000 · Environment
Other$2,168,393International$775,000Philanthropy$340,500Education$267,100Health$205,800Science & Tech$200,000Environment$104,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $775,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetSEASIDE INSTITUTE INC: $397,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR APPLIED TRANSECT STU: $310,000 over 2y, 68% of budgetFlorida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPoint Washington Medical Clinic Inc: $190,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $152,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $67,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSEASIDE AGING WITH GRACE INC: $60,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetSCENIC WALTON INC: $35,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetCambodian Childrens Fund: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetSMART GROWTH AMERICA: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAGUNA SECA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM INC: $10,195 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMENT LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFANT MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetKQED INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $9,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOGDEN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ART: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNOKUSE EDUCATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK DANCE PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAHARISHI FOUNDATION USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTIOCH COLLEGE CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENBELT ALLIANCEPEOPLE FOR OPEN SPACE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROSEMARY BEACH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPORTLAND ART MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZEN HOSPICE PROJECT DBA ZEN CAREGIVING PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Florida State University Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON RIVER TIME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME ↗
  • Who funds SEASIDE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR APPLIED TRANSECT STU ↗
  • Who funds Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Inc ↗
  • Who funds Point Washington Medical Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC ↗
  • Who funds SEASIDE AGING WITH GRACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida Wildlife Federation ↗
  • Who funds SCENIC WALTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Cambodian Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKING REFORM NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SMART GROWTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAGUNA SECA ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM INC ↗
  • Who funds MENT LTD ↗
  • Who funds FANT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THOUGHT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jesse W Couch Charitable FoundationTX15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jesse W Couch Charitable Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Alys Foundationinc · Gaia Fund · The St Joe Community Foundation Inc · McNabb Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Chicago Community Trust · Texas Instruments Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Davis Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Davis Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Inc: 23% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Portland Art Museum: 1% of income from government
  • Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Davis Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Davis Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Davis Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph