Skip to content

· Private foundation

The David and Dorothy Carpenter Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$51kAnimals$45kHousing & Shelter$38kEducation$35kYouth Development$25kMembership Benefit$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kHealth$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$642k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGY$5,000
EMILY DICKINSON MUSEUM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TROUPSBURG VOL FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
MARY HOAR HUSTED SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $25k → 21%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $4k → 9%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 9%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $600 → 9%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $300 → 9%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $200 → 9%PATHWAYS INC: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
MO
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 23 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
23

Total granted

$241k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+7%

Still filing today

57%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHealthPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WESTPORT FARMERS MARKET INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $42k · revenue +128%
  • HW
    HOMES WITH HOPE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $28k · revenue +35%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MATHENY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $13k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • HI
    HOPE IGNITES
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHURCH OF WOODHULL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

—
2
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

Connecticut public broadcasting, inc. will inform, educate and inspire the people of connecticut, connecting and empowering the people of ct through outstanding journalism, storytelling, education and experiences, to make our state a more…

Arts & Culture
5
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
7
Foodshare Inc

Foodshare is leading an informed, coordinated response to hunger as part of the overall community effort to alleviate poverty in hartford and tolland counties.

—
8
Liberation Programs Inc

Liberation programs' mission is to provide prevention, treatment, community outreach, and recovery services to help individuals and their families impacted by substance use and mental health conditions to foster hope and maintain wellness.

Health
9
Cares of Farmington Hills Inc

To provide comprehensive support services for individuals and families that are in need of everyday necessities due to insufficient financial resources or family instabilty. c.a.r.e.s. will offer food, clothing, job education and training…

Food & Nutrition
10
The Food Bank of Lower Fairfield County Inc

The food bank's mission is to provide nutritious food to non-profit organizations that feed the hungry in darien, greenwich, new canaan, norwalk, stamford and wilton ct., while seeking to raise awareness of, and promote action to combat,…

Food & Nutrition
11
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
12
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Survival Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $40,000 · OtherCORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGYHOMES WITH HOPE: $28,000 · OtherHOMES WITH HOPEIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF BYRAM SHUBERT LIBRARY: $17,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BYRAM SHUBERT LIBRARYIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF MATHENY: $13,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MATHENYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHURCH OF WOODHULL: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $9,000 · OtherTROUPSBURG VOL FIRE DEPT: $8,000 · Other+25 more: $42,250 · Other+25 moreWESTPORT FARMERS MARKET INC: $42,000 · Food & NutritionWESTPORT FARMERS…NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NY I: $6,500 · Food & NutritionNORTHEAST ORGANI…+1 more: $300 · Food & NutritionHOPE IGNITES: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOPE IGNITESBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $7,100 · Human ServicesBRIDGEPORT R…SURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesSURVIVAL CEN…PATHWAYS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $13,000 · EducationTHE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC: $6,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF CONNECTICUT INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCARBON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionHORIZONS INC: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$213,250Food & Nutrition$48,800Human Services$38,100Education$24,500Philanthropy$6,000Religion$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTPORT FARMERS MARKET INC: $42,000 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetHOMES WITH HOPE: $28,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE IGNITES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF MATHENY: $13,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $7,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NY I: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CONNECTICUT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRICA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPalmerton Area Historical Society: $1,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetWESTPORT VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTPORT POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTPORT FARMERS MARKET INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES WITH HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MATHENY ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NY I ↗
  • Who funds THE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds SURVIVAL CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds Palmerton Area Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds WESTPORT VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTPORT POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARBON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The James & Mary Ellen Marpe Family FoundationCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The James & Mary Ellen Marpe Family Foundation · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Citizens Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The David and Dorothy Carpenter Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The David and Dorothy Carpenter Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • United Way of Connecticut Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Horizons Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Homes With Hope: 28% of income from government
  • Survival Centers Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The David and Dorothy Carpenter Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The David and Dorothy Carpenter Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David and Dorothy Carpenter’s filings →

More from the funding graph