· Private foundation
The David and Carol Lackland Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of THE DAVID AND CAROL LACKLAND FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k10 grants · $225k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $475k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REEF RENEWAL USA INC | $250,000 |
| GIFT OF LIFE FDN DISTRICT 7490 | $150,000 |
| PROJECT USE | $125,000 |
| PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK | $50,000 |
| GREAT SWAMP WATER SHED ASSOC | $50,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR | $50,000 |
| BINNACLE HOUSE | $50,000 |
| RIDGEWOOD ROTARY FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| TOTA TURN ON TO AMERICA | $30,000 |
| CONSERVE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF NJ | $25,000 |
| NOURISH NJ | $25,000 |
| CURE ALZHEIMERS FUND | $20,000 |
| CORAL BAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| SAVING THE BLUE INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $515k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PUPROJECT USE9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +75% · 47% of their budget
- RRREEF RENEWAL USA INC4× · 2022–2025 · $800k · revenue +32% · 27% of their budget
- GSGreat Swamp Watershed Association9× · 2017–2025 · $621k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- BBBIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -28%
- CUCENTENARY UNIVERSITYone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -4%
- MMMICHAEL MANCINI HERO FUND CO FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCERone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…
Clean ocean action's goal is to improve and protect the waters off the new jersey/new york coast from pollution, plastics, industrialization and climate change with research, education and citizen action.
The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).
Hudson carbon is dedicated to catalyzing the adoption of regenerative organic agriculture by advancing our scientific understanding of its practices and systems, and their potential to radically reverse climate change and environmental…
The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…
Coriell's mission is to accelerate scientific discovery by generating, banking, storing and distributing world-class biomaterials, and conducting groundbreaking research in genetics and epigenetics.
The mission of biomedical research institute of new jersey, inc. (brinj) is to advance medical knowledge through research, discover novel methods for disease prevention and treatment, and educate the next generation of medical research…
The Ocean Genome Atlas Project OGAP aims to collect, classify, sequence and map the genomic information of organisms representing at least 80 of the extant marine species worldwide. Deploying a fleet of advanced but cost effective research…
Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute (the Institute) was organized pursuant to the General Nonprofit Corporation Law of the State of California. The primary purpose for which the Institute was formed is to conduct biological, environmental,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centenary University and the most unlike its peers is Tota. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROJECT USE ↗
- Who funds REEF RENEWAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds Great Swamp Watershed Association ↗
- Who funds RIDGEWOOD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTERDON YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Hunterdon County Inc ↗
- Who funds BIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN AID FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TOTA ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SAVING THE BLUE INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT INC ↗
- Who funds CENTENARY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NOURISHNJ INC ↗
- Who funds CORAL BAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Paper Mill Playhouse ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · Pseg Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The David and Carol Lackland Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Nourishnj Inc — 27% of income from government
- Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey Inc — 14% of income from government
- Paper Mill Playhouse — 9% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Turning Point Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.