· Private foundation
The Daugette Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE HOLY COMFOR | $40,210 |
| JACKSONVILLE STATE FOUNDATION | $17,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL | $6,400 |
| JAMES GADSDEN CHAPTER DAR | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| GADSDEN CITY SCHOOLS | $3,000 |
| VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS | $1,725 |
| KIDNEY ASSOCIATION | $1,125 |
| ALABAMA PUBLIC TELEVISION | $1,000 |
| THOMAS DRIVE VOL FD | $1,000 |
| NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| ORDER OF THE DAUGHTERS OF THE KING | $400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ECEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE HOLY COMFOR8× · 2017–2024 · $227k
- EDEPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · $55k
- JSJACKSONVILLE STATE FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2024 · $34k
Funded once
- RFRETRIEVING FREEDOM INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +178%
- GHGADSDEN HUMANE SOCIETYone grant, 2020 · $3k
- TWTHE WAY OF THE CROSS MINISTRIESone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Gfda, through its executive committee and staff, serves as a resource center for information on all aspects of funeral service, and strives to answer all questions in a courteous manner while providing a greater understanding of the…
Cemetery maintenance, restoration, and improvements
Promote forest industry & forest products
Operation of a historical cemetery
Ownership, operation, and maintenance of cemeteries.
Provide services in maintenance and upkeep of the cemetery and preserve and share the history of this property.
To assist in providing for the rehabilitation and continuing welfare of america's disabled veterans, their families, dependents and survivors.
Cemetery operations
To provide contractual services, amenities and accomodations in an environmentally pleasing and secure environment, to promote privacy and a sense of community, and to offer opportunities for personal growth and well-being.
Maintenance and upkeep of the marks, mississippi cemetery
Develop, construct, and manage a continuing care retirement community.
Cemetery operations
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oak Hill Memorial Association and the most unlike its peers is National Kidney Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RETRIEVING FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds THE WAY OF THE CROSS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GADSDEN CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OAK HILL MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FORREST CEMETERY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED DAUGHTERS OF THE CONFEDERACY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Daugette Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.