Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Datck Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$134kHousing & Shelter$78kEducation$76kHuman Services$55kHealth$47kEnvironment$41kArts & Culture$24kInternational$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $98k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTUARY FARMS$30,000
COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$17,500
LOWER MERIAN CONSERVANCY$10,000
DIVERSIFY DIETETICS$10,000
PHILLY HOUSE$10,000
PHILABUNDANCE$10,000
JESSE TREE OF IDAHO$10,000
HOME OF THE SPARROW$5,000
SQUASH SMARTS INC$2,500
FEEDING AMERICA$2,500
MANN CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS$2,500
ST JOSEPH'S PREPARATORY HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,100
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $10k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $10k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $10k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $10k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $1k → 8%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 22%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $600 → 9%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $1k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $250 → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $100 → 22%PHILLY HOUSE: $10k → 22%SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 22%PHILLY HOUSE: $10k → 22%SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $6k → 22%PHILLY HOUSE: $10k → 22%SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
IN
PA
CA
MO
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 35 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
25

Total granted

$428k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+5%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +59%
  • TJ
    THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +63%
  • LM
    LOWER MERION CONSERVANCY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • MC
    MERCY CORPS(TURKEY)
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • MC
    MERCY CORPS(UKRAINE)
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • ST
    SAVE THE CHILDREN(UKRAINE)
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
8
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Bryn Mawr College

Provide a rigorous education and encourage pursuit of knowledge as preparation for life and work.

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance; the most unlike its peers is Lower Merion Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTUARY FARMS: $66,500 · OtherSANTUARY FARMSLOWER MERION TOWNSHIP SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $26,350 · OtherLOWER MERION TOWNSHIP SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIONMANN CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $13,500 · OtherMANN CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTSIndividual grant recipient: $7,736 · OtherACUMEN FUND INC: $7,500 · Other+35 more: $80,192 · Other+35 moreSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $48,000 · Human ServicesSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCU…THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $42,000 · Human ServicesTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAH…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,700 · Human Services+1 more: $1,350 · Human ServicesPhilabundance: $35,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundancePENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW: $23,500 · Food & NutritionPENNSYLVANIA HOME…Feeding America: $16,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionLOWER MERION CONSERVANCY: $37,500 · Arts & CultureLOWER MERI…WHYY INC: $4,050 · Arts & CultureWHYY INCTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARNES…+2 more: $1,150 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $26,500 · HealthTHE REFLECT ORGANIZATION: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthDIVERSIFY DIETETICS INC: $15,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $9,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $2,250 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationHARCUM COLLEGE: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationSQUASHSMARTS INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$201,778Human Services$96,050Food & Nutrition$75,000Arts & Culture$45,700Health$31,600Education$29,350Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $48,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $42,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLOWER MERION CONSERVANCY: $37,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetPhilabundance: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $26,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW: $23,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFeeding America: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIVERSIFY DIETETICS INC: $15,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSQUASHSMARTS INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REFLECT ORGANIZATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $4,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPrison Yoga Project Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBRIDLEWILD TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,800 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMAIN LINE MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $1,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR FIRE COMPANY: $1,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc: $1,120 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARRITON ASSOCIATION: $1,050 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR RELATIONSHIPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARCUM COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWER MERION LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWER MERION CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds DIVERSIFY DIETETICS INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHSMARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE REFLECT ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds WHYY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Prison Yoga Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIDLEWILD TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gordon Charter FoundationPA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gordon Charter Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Hamilton Family Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The William Penn Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Datck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Datck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Datck’s filings →

More from the funding graph