Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Danis Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$257k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.9MEducation$621kArts & Culture$253kCommunity Improvement$77kHousing & Shelter$66kPhilanthropy$62kYouth Development$49kCivil Rights$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k41 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$50,000
CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$34,000
MOUNT CARMEL FOUNDATION$33,333
BAPTIST HEALTH$25,000
FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL$10,000
WRIGHT MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
HAMPTON UNIVERSITY$1,500
THE COLLEGE OF DESIGN$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$1,500
CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of The Danis Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 67%.

The Danis Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 42 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
15

Total granted

$3.2M
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+12%

Still filing today

36%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureReligionCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation
    7× · 2017–2024 · $680k · revenue +208%
  • KM
    KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $551k · revenue +201%
  • UO
    University of Dayton
    8× · 2017–2025 · $332k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • OS
    OAKWOOD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • JB
    JESIE BALL DUPONT FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • DS
    DAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dayton Osteopathic Hospital

Our mission is to live god's love by promoting and restoring health.

Health
2
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
3
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
4
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
5
Tiffin University

Educate students by linking knowledge to professional practice.

Education
6
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Christian University; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $550,750 · HealthKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $266,000 · HealthDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALGrandview Foundation: $172,500 · HealthGrandview FoundationThe Christ Hospital Foundation: $60,000 · HealthThe Christ Hospital FoundationFORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Health+2 more: $15,000 · HealthGREENE MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $127,500 · OtherGREENE MEDICAL FOUNDATIO…MT CARMEL FOUNDATION: $66,666 · OtherMT CARMEL FOUNDATIONRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $66,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEUF FOUNDATIONS INC FUND: $50,000 · OtherUF FOUNDATIONS INC FUNDBAPTIST HEALTH: $41,667 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTHJESSIE BALL DUPONT FUND: $35,715 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $33,500 · OtherMOUNT CARMEL FOUNDATION: $33,333 · OtherOAKWOOD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+33 more: $195,869 · Other+33 moreBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $680,000 · ReligionBon Secours Mercy Heal…University of Dayton: $331,761 · EducationUniversity of Dayto…Cedarville University: $209,000 · EducationCedarville Universi…THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $43,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF DIRECT…+4 more: $11,500 · EducationTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $150,000 · Arts & CultureDayton Performing Arts Alliance: $40,000 · Arts & CultureGreater Dayton Public Television dba Think TV: $37,750 · Arts & CultureDAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VICTORY PROJECT LLC: $49,223 · Crime & LegalGOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $1,000 · Human Services
Health$1,104,250Other$744,250Religion$680,000Education$595,261Arts & Culture$237,750Crime & Legal$49,223Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $680,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $550,750 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $331,761 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $266,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $209,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGrandview Foundation: $172,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $150,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetThe Christ Hospital Foundation: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE VICTORY PROJECT LLC: $49,223 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $43,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDayton Performing Arts Alliance: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetGreater Dayton Public Television dba Think TV: $37,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington College: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOhio Northern University: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds Grandview Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Christ Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTORY PROJECT LLC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Dayton Performing Arts Alliance ↗
  • Who funds FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Dayton Public Television dba Think TV ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationOH21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · The Troy Foundation · Kettering Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · The Jesse and Caryl Philips Foundation · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · Levin Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · The Schiewetz Foundation Inc · Frank M Tait Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Danis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Danis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Danis Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Danis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Danis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph