Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Daniel J Schwinn Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$310kEnvironment$200kArts & Culture$151kHealth$20kInternational$16kPhilanthropy$13kReligion$10kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$660k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION$10,000
THE PARKER FOUNDATION$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CRANBERRY SUNSET FARM: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$704k · 13 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$704k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+28%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +20%
  • CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +122%
  • DO
    DAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND
    2× · 2018–2021 · $16k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • FU
    Fordham Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • SC
    Space Coast Discovery Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +82%
  • CE
    CLUB ESTEEM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
The Trustees of Reservations

Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.

Environment
5
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
8
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
9
Seacoast Science Center Inc

It is the mission of the seacoast science center to spark curiosity, enhance understanding, and inspire conservation of our blue planet. the center's programming and exhibits encourage visitors and other program participants to recognize…

Arts & Culture
10
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
11
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
12
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is Conservation Law Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY TRINITY EPISCOPAL ACADEMY INC: $263,500 · OtherHOLY TRINITY EPISCOPAL ACADEMY INCOUR LADY OF LOURDES CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $38,200 · OtherOUR LADY OF LOURDES CATHOLIC SCHOOL+12 more: $46,450 · Other+12 moreTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC: $150,000 · EnvironmentTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INCCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $200 · EnvironmentEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION…+1 more: $115 · Arts & CultureDAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND: $15,500 · InternationalFordham University: $5,000 · EducationSpace Coast Discovery Inc: $5,000 · HealthCLUB ESTEEM INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$348,150Environment$200,200Arts & Culture$150,115International$15,500Education$5,000Health$5,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND: $15,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFordham University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpace Coast Discovery Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLUB ESTEEM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCRANBERRY SUNSET FARM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $115 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds Space Coast Discovery Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLUB ESTEEM INC ↗
  • Who funds CRANBERRY SUNSET FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Brevard IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Brevard Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Daniel J Schwinn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Daniel J Schwinn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Three Bays Preservation Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Daniel J Schwinn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Daniel J Schwinn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daniel J Schwinn’s filings →

More from the funding graph