Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Daniel and Karen Berman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2020
21
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

76% of The Daniel and Karen Berman Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Daniel and Karen Berman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $52k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
17
10
18
6
19
8
20
11
21
10
22
9
23
10
24
11
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$776kFood & Nutrition$65kHousing & Shelter$55kArts & Culture$55kEducation$45kReligion$28kYouth Development$20kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2020 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k19 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,385
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC$10,000
URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC$10,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$5,000
EAST DURHAM CHILDRENS INITIATIVE$2,500
DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION$2,500
JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION$2,500
DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION$2,500
DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION$2,500
DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION$2,500
DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION$2,500
JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION$2,385
DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION$1,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$1,000
DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION$1,000
DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $152k → 10%NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS: $3k → 8%FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $15k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $10k → 12%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $90k → 10%FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $10k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%PRO PUBLICA INC: $3k → 17%FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $10k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $10k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $8k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $8k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $3k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $3k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%DURHAM CHILDRENS INITIATIVE: $10k → 11%EAST DURHAM CHILDRENS INITIATIVE: $3k → 11%EAST DURHAM CHILDRENS INITIATIVE: $3k → 11%EAST DURHAM CHILDRENS INITIATIVE: $3k → 11%URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC: $10k → 11%CAROLINA THEATRE OF DURHAM INC: $10k → 11%CAROLINA THEATRE OF DURHAM INC: $10k → 11%CAROLINA THEATRE OF DURHAM INC: $10k → 11%URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC: $10k → 11%CAROLINA THEATRE OF DURHAM INC: $10k → 11%URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC: $8k → 11%URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC: $8k → 11%URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC: $8k → 11%URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC: $8k → 11%CAROLINA THEATRE OF DURHAM INC: $5k → 11%URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC: $3k → 11%URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM INC: $3k → 11%DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $152k → 11%DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $110k → 11%DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 11%JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $5k → 11%DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 11%DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 11%DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 11%DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 11%DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
NE
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$266k · 11 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$266k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+80%

Still filing today

91%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $65k · revenue +98%
  • Urban Ministries of Durham Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $55k · revenue +39%
  • Carolina Theatre of Durham Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +351%

Funded once

  • IT
    ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +80%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • DA
    DURHAM ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
3
Duke Student Publishing Company Inc

The organization's mission is to be the first and best source of independent news analysis about the duke community and to develop outstanding student leaders through journalism.

Education
4
The Durham Museum

Provide relevant educational and entertaining opportunities within the region that exceed customer expectations, while preserving our community's vibrant cultural history.

Arts & Culture
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
Community School of Davidson Inc

Community school of davidson believes that every student can and will succeed in ways that reflect his or her own aptitudes and interests. our mission is to use the principles of "the basis school" to provide an optimum environment for…

Education
7
Student U

Our mission is to empower and equip first-generation college students in durham public schools, their families, and educators to become the leaders that will transform our city.

Education
8
North Carolina Bar Association

The north carolina bar association is organized for the purposes of promoting and improving the administration of justice in north carolina; fostering and encouraging law reform when in the public interest; advancing the science of…

9
North Carolina Chamber

The organization is a proactive, nonpartisan business advocacy organization. the organization works in the legislative, regulatory and political arenas to proactively drive positive change to ensure that north carolina is a leading place…

10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
North Carolina Symphony Foundation

To receive and hold the endowment of the north carolina symphony society, inc. (the "society"), solicit additions to the endowment, safeguard assets, and expend funds for the exclusive use and benefit of the society.

Arts & Culture
12
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Greater Trenton Jewish Cemetery Proj. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $435,800 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION — $329,900 · OtherDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATIONUrban Ministries of Durham Inc — $55,000 · OtherUrban Ministries of Durham IncJUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION — $27,850 · OtherJUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION+7 more — $11,230 · OtherFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $65,000 · Food & NutritionCarolina Theatre of Durham Inc — $45,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE GREATER TRENTON JEWISH CEMETERY PROJ — $2,000 · Arts & CultureDUKE UNIVERSITY — $33,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $4,500 · Education+1 more — $500 · EducationDURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE — $19,500 · Youth DevelopmentCHORDOMA FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthCAROLINA ABORTION FUND — $2,500 · Health
Philanthropy$445,800Other$423,980Food & Nutrition$65,000Arts & Culture$49,500Education$43,500Youth Development$19,500Health$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $435,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION — $329,900 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $65,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Ministries of Durham Inc — $55,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCarolina Theatre of Durham Inc — $45,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $33,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE — $19,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $5,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHORDOMA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH CAROLINA PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA ABORTION FUND — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GREATER TRENTON JEWISH CEMETERY PROJ — $2,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM ACADEMY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · The Shepard Broad Foundation Inc · Duke University Health System Inc · Fox Family Foundation Inc · The Forest At Duke Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Duke Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Daniel and Karen Berman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Daniel and Karen Berman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Daniel and Karen Berman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph