Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dana-Z Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$60kReligion$49kInternational$47kArts & Culture$23kHuman Services$15kHealth$8kCivil Rights$7kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MED GLOBAL$25,000
THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$5,000
AMERICAN MUSLIM SOCIETY$5,000
SAC$5,000
PURE HANDS$1,500
ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION$1,000
UMMA FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PURE HANDS: $4k → 5%BAITULMAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SAMS FOUNDATION: $35k → 8%SAC: $5k → 14%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 21%SAMS FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%MOUNTAINS MEDICS INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 7%CITIZENS FOR SECURITY AMERICA: $5k → 5%TOLEDO ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION: $4k → 18%PURE HANDS: $2k → 5%ICA: $15k → 8%AL IKHLAS TRAINING ACADEMY: $1k → 21%RAHMA WORLDWIDE: $10k → 8%INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR RELEASE: $1k → 21%RAHMA FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%IMAD HAMAD AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS: $6k → 21%ICA: $5k → 8%AAN: $5k → 21%ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $3k → 8%AHRC: $3k → 21%RAHMA FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%AHRC: $3k → 21%ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 8%IMAD HAMAD AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS: $2k → 21%ICA: $2k → 8%AHRC: $1k → 21%ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $1k → 8%YACC: $1k → 21%ICA: $1k → 8%IMAN ISLAMIC CENTER: $1k → 21%HUDA SCHOOL: $1k → 8%AMERICAN MUSLIM SOCIETY: $9k → 21%MUC: $5k → 8%AMERICAN MUSLIM SOCIETY: $5k → 21%OAKLAND EARLY COLLEGE: $100 → 8%MED GLOBAL: $5k → 21%MED GLOBAL: $25k → 8%AMERICAN MUSLIM SOCIETY: $2k → 21%ASIM KHAN FOR FH COUNCIL: $1k → 8%AMERICAN MUSLIM SOCIETY: $2k → 21%THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5k → 21%FOUNTAIN OF LIVE: $5k → 21%MUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 21%MUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
CO
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 9 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$120k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+75%

Still filing today

22%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    MED GLOBAL
    2× · 2021–2024 · $30k
  • I
    ICA
    4× · 2017–2021 · $23k
  • AM
    AMERICAN MOSLEM SOCIETY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $18k

Funded once

  • SF
    SAMS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • BF
    BAITULMAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • RW
    RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
3
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
4
Tvislaamaa

To spread islamic values to the globe through media

Arts & Culture
5
Darul Quran Academy Inc

Friday jumah salah, hifz school. weekend qural class, daily five time salah.

Human Services
6
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
7
Al-Zaharah Islamic Education Center
—
8
Rahmat-E-Alam Foundation

The mission of rahmat-e-alam is to enlighten humanity with the authentic knowledge of islam.

Religion
9
Ihya Foundation

Religious School With Mosque

Religion
10
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
11
Ikmia Inc

Mosque

Human Services
12
Al Hurvisadamm Education Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Islamic Cultural Association; the most unlike its peers is Sam Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAMS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherSAMS FOUNDATIONMED GLOBAL: $30,000 · OtherMED GLOBALICA: $23,000 · OtherICAAMERICAN MOSLEM SOCIETY: $17,500 · OtherAMERICAN MOSLEM SOCIETYMUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 · OtherMUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTERBAITULMAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherRAHMA FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherIMAD HAMAD AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS: $7,300 · OtherAHRC: $7,200 · Other+14 more: $39,825 · Other+14 moreRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 · InternationalPURE HANDS INC: $5,500 · InternationalISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5,000 · EducationHUDA SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationUNITED COMMUNITY CENETR INC: $3,000 · ReligionOUR UMMA INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSAM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$192,825International$15,500Arts & Culture$6,000Education$6,000Religion$3,000Housing & Shelter$1,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENETR INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUDA SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PURE HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENETR INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OUR UMMA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAM FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tabbaa FoundationMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tabbaa Foundation · The Bitar Foundatiuon · The Syed Foundation · Sattar Family Foundation · The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · Dearborn Community Center · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dana-Z Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dana-Z Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dana-Z’s filings →

    More from the funding graph