· Private foundation
Berkshire Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $455k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY | $35,000 |
| HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| SAFE BERKS | $25,000 |
| MENS SECOND CHANCE LIVING A NON- PROFIT CORPORATIO | $25,000 |
| OPPORTUNITY HOUSE | $25,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $25,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| READING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| READING SCIENCE CENTER | $20,000 |
| MISS HALLS SCHOOL INC | $10,000 |
| HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC | $10,000 |
| ROANOKE VALLEY SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
| PTA NORTH CAROLINA CONGRESS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $340k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $175k · revenue +63%
- SBSAFE BERKS5× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +28%
- OHOPPORTUNITY HOUSE5× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- SCST CHRISTOPHERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2020 · $15k
- GMGOVERNOR MIFFLIN AQUATICS CLUBone grant, 2020 · $10k
- GWGOGGLE WORKSone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Berks community health center provides exceptional family-centered primary and preventive healthcare for all residents of berks county, regardless of economic status.
The ymca of reading and berks county's mission is to put judeo-christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the ymca of reading and berks county is a cause-driven organization that…
To support the mission of westminster-canterbury on chesapeake bay
The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.
The reading berks association of realtors promotes a high standard of professionalism, advocates for private property rights, and strives to improve the quality of life in our communities.
Rivermead is a progressive not-for-profit continuing care retirement community that advocates for an enriched lifestyle with cultural and educational opportunities. continued on schedule "o".we continuously strive to provide high-quality,…
Provide residential, recreational, health services and day care facilities for, and to otherwise assist, elderly or low income men and women.
Primary mission is to extend the facilities and services of rw-c inc. to aid as many deserving individuals as can prudently be supported with the funds available to the foundation.
Assisted Living and Nursing Care
See schedule othe mission of westminster-canterbury on chesapeake bay is to establish, provide, maintain, operate, manage, control, or regulate one or more health care or residential services for older adults, including providing services…
Rappahannock westminster-canterbury is a church-related continuing care retirement community committed to providing the highest quality living experience for senior adults. rw-c provides independent living, assisted living and nursing home…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity House and the most unlike its peers is Squirrel Island Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE BERKS ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds READING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds READING SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE YOCUM INSTITUTE FOR ARTS EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING ↗
- Who funds ROANOKE VALLEY SPEECH & HEARING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA ↗
- Who funds CREW BOOSTERS OF WINTER PARK INC ↗
- Who funds Nourish Up ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BERKS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SALEM MINISTERS CONFERENCE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ROLLINS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WYOMISSING PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRUST OF BERKS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Dilworth Center for Chemical Dependency ↗
- Who funds ONAWAY CAMP TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE ↗
- Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
- Who funds The Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON CENTER FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds EASY DOES IT INC ↗
- Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berks County Community Foundation Inc · The Breidegam Family Foundation · Henry Janssen Foundation · The Wyomissing Foundation Inc · Penn Entertainment Foundation · Marlin Miller Jr Family Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · The Cynthia and Jim Boscov Family Foundation · Blue Mountain Foundation · Hammel Family Foundation · The Catherine V and Martin Hofmann Foundation · Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Berkshire Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Rollins College — 0% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Berkshire Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Berkshire Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.