Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Curry Stone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$289kEducation$203kCrime & Legal$201kArts & Culture$83kCommunity Improvement$79kEnvironment$65kInternational$57kRecreation & Sports$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$721
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SNEHALAYA$50,000
MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$35,000
ARCHITECTS FOUNDATION$25,000
THE WORLD AROUND INC$25,000
CENTER FOR ARCHITECTURE DESIGN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 59% of grant dollars ($651k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 41% that went abroad ($461k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
OR
PA
CA
MO
MD
AZ
AR
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX

Beyond the US: 41% of all-years giving ($461k)

16 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$416k · 10 grants
United Kingdom$9k · 6 grants
France$8k · 5 grants
Italy$3k · 2 grants
Peru$3k · 2 grants
OC$3k · 2 grants
Spain$3k · 2 grants
Germany$3k · 2 grants
Netherlands$3k · 2 grants
Brazil$2k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$854k · 13 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
63

Total granted

$854k
$207k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+40%

Still filing today

69%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AIA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $127k · revenue +61%
  • WA
    WORLD AROUND INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +53%
  • BI
    BETHLEHEM INN
    2× · 2017–2020 · $26k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • HF
    HUNNARSHALA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • HF
    HUNNARSHALA FOUNDATION - SAHJEEVAN FC
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
  • PF
    PSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
2
Berggruen Institute
Education
3
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
6
Warnecke Institute Inc

Warnecke architectural archives mission:the warnecke archives welcomes and encourages the study of its architectural collection. a wealth of material exists for historians, students, and other researchers to use at warnecke archives. the…

Arts & Culture
7
The Urban Land Institute

Shape the future of the built environment for transformative impact in communities worldwide. we are a global network of professionals in every sector of real estate development and land use, from private enterprise to public service.

Environment
8
The Seattle Chapter American Institute of Archite

We champion the central role of architects in creating and sustaining a better built environment.

—
9
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
10
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
11
Segd

Promote awareness of our community and its role in shaping experience. nurture demand for design excellence within the built environment. serve as a source of education and inspiration for our community. continue to define and refine our…

Community Improvement
12
Past Foundation

By partnering anthropology with science and technology, we invite the world to design, construct and engage in experiences that link learning to life. past works with schools, districts and states to help transform education in terms of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Melanoma Kills Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CURRY STONE DESIGN FOUNDATION: $224,362 · OtherCURRY STONE DESIGN FOUNDATIONUC REGENTS: $60,000 · OtherUC REGENTSHUNNARSHALA FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherHUNNARSHALA FOUNDATIONSNEHALAYA: $50,000 · OtherSNEHALAYASNEHALAYA FOUNDATION: $38,500 · OtherSNEHALAYA FOUNDATIONHUNNARSHALA FOUNDATION - SAHJEEVAN FC: $35,808 · OtherHUNNARSHALA FOUNDATION - SAHJEEVAN FC+58 more: $127,759 · Other+58 moreDESIGNING JUSTICE DESIGNING SPACES: $200,000 · Crime & LegalDESIGNING JUSTICE DE…+1 more: $1,000 · Crime & LegalAIA FOUNDATION: $126,500 · EducationAIA FOUNDATIO…+2 more: $2,250 · EducationWORLD AROUND INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $5,250 · Arts & CultureMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $54,470 · InternationalGIRLS GARAGE: $5,000 · InternationalBETHLEHEM INN: $26,000 · Housing & ShelterOPEN ARCHITECTURE COLLABORATIVE INC: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$596,429Crime & Legal$201,000Education$128,750Arts & Culture$75,250International$59,470Housing & Shelter$26,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDESIGNING JUSTICE DESIGNING SPACES: $200,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetAIA FOUNDATION: $126,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $54,470 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD AROUND INC: $50,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN: $26,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOPEN ARCHITECTURE COLLABORATIVE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCENTER FOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN: $20,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetGEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONAL: $18,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMELANOMA KILLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGIRLS GARAGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSCALEHOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetProject Row Houses: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCHAEOLOGICAL LEGACY INSTITUTE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIRAGLO FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DESIGNING JUSTICE DESIGNING SPACES ↗
  • Who funds AIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD AROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARCHITECTURE COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds GEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MELANOMA KILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS GARAGE ↗
  • Who funds SCALEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Project Row Houses ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN SOURCE ECOLOGY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Curry Stone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Curry Stone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Scalehouse: 10% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Curry Stone’s filings →

More from the funding graph