Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Crowther Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$246kHealth$128kPhilanthropy$106kEducation$102kFood & Nutrition$30kHousing & Shelter$25kCrime & Legal$23kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Ensworth School$17,500
Second Harvest Food Bank$10,000
CARE House of Oakland County$10,000
Sexual Assault Center$10,000
The Exodus Road Inc$7,500
Safe Families for Children$7,500
Bridges for Deaf Hard of Hearing$6,000
Mama Lere Hearing School$6,000
United Way of Berks County$5,000
Special Olympis Tennessee$5,000
Olivet Boys Girls Club$5,000
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries$5,000
Nashville Rescue Mission$5,000
MACC Fund$5,000
Hollands Haul$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Safe Families for Children: $8k → 14%Safe Families for Children: $8k → 14%Safe Families for Children: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of The Crowther Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Crowther Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$722k · 22 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$722k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+25%

Still filing today

59%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +38%
  • TE
    THE ENSWORTH SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $78k · revenue +74%
  • BF
    BRIDGES FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING
    5× · 2021–2025 · $36k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOLIDAY HEROES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • SH
    Shrine High School
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
2
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
3
Nashville Zoo Inc

In fulfillment of our mission to inspire a culture of understanding and discovery of our natural world through conservation, innovation and leadership, our goal is to build a first class zoo for middle tennessee and to develop a facility…

Animals
4
Oasis Center Inc

Oasis center targets undeserved youth, families, schools, and neighborhoods with a mission to help youth grow, thrive and create positive change in their lives and in our community.

Community Improvement
5
National Domestic Violence Hotline

The national domestic violence hotline provides crisis intervention, saftey planning, resources, information, and referrals to those affected by relationship abuse.

Human Services
6
Disability Rights Tennessee Fka Disability Law & Advocacy Center Tn

Disability rights tennessee is a nonprofit legal services organization dedicated to protecting the rights of tennesseans with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Haven Inc

To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence

Crime & Legal
8
Westcare Tennessee Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
9
Daybreak Youth Services

Daybreak saves young lives by demonstrating love and bringing hope for their future.

Health
10
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Rahab House

Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…

Human Services
12
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Salvation Army: $85,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOlivet Boys Girls Club: $55,000 · OtherOlivet Boys Girls ClubBRIDGES FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING: $36,000 · OtherBRIDGES FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARINGChrist Episcopal Church: $30,000 · OtherChrist Episcopal ChurchSecond Harvest Food Bank: $26,000 · OtherSecond Harvest Food BankMACC Fund: $24,000 · OtherMACC FundSPECIAL OLYMPICS TENNESSEE INC: $15,000 · OtherTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $20,000 · Other+5 more: $34,000 · Other+5 moreUNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF B…THE ENSWORTH SCHOOL: $77,500 · EducationTHE ENSWORTH S…DAYBREAK ARTS: $13,000 · EducationDAYBREAK ARTSVanderbilt University Medical Center: $25,000 · HealthVanderbilt…SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $25,000 · HealthSEXUAL ASS…Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $15,000 · HealthDetroit Re…THE HOLIDAY HEROES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $22,500 · Crime & LegalSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$400,000Philanthropy$100,000Education$90,500Health$67,500Housing & Shelter$25,000Crime & Legal$22,500Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC: $100,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ENSWORTH SCHOOL: $77,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGES FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING: $36,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS TENNESSEE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAYBREAK ARTS: $13,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOLIDAY HEROES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ENSWORTH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE EXODUS ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYBREAK ARTS ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE HOLIDAY HEROES FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hca Healthcare FoundationTN15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Frist Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Crowther Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Crowther Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crowther’s filings →

    More from the funding graph