· Private foundation
The Crimson Riverstone Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSONS RESEARCH | $10,000 |
| NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $5,000 |
| SOCIETY FOR PRESERVATION & ENCOURMT OF BARBERSHOP | $5,000 |
| CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| OPERATION FOR HOPE FOUNDATION INC | $3,000 |
| JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH | $3,000 |
| LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| STANDUP FOR KIDS | $3,000 |
| PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND S P C A | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| CRISTO REY SAN DIEGO HIGH SCHOOL INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue 0%- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +19%
- OFOperation For HOPE Foundation2× · 2024–2025 · $4k
Funded once
- DNDEL NORTE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue +4%
- SDSoi Dog Foundation USAone grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue 0%
- HWHumane World for Animals Internationalone grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.
Friends of Humane Services in Tijuana was founded in August of 2007. Our mission is to support organizations and individuals who work to improve the conditions in the US and Mexican communities that border the Tijuana, Mexico area, by…
Protection of animal rights
Humane World for Animals, Inc., formerly known as the Humane Society of the United States (The Organization), seeks to tackle the root causes of animal cruelty and suffering. CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O
We create access to essential veterniary care including low cost spay and neuter, vaccines, and microchips, to encourage responsible pet ownership and transform communities from crisis to thriving.
Project Street Vet empowers veterinary teams to deliver professional, non-judgmental medical care & support to pet families experiencing homelessness and housing vulnerability.
Inactive
Rescue companion animals from the la paz area of the baja peninsula; rehabilitate them; and find loving, permanent homes for them in mexico, the us, and canada. provide education to the public concerning the proper care of companion…
Sante DOr is a no-kill animal adoption center serving the Los Angeles community, predominantly staffed by volunteers.
The foundation supports the california city animal shelter and community companion animals. our dedicated goals of extended rescue and adoption lifelines, spay and neuter promotion. education awareness and quality of life improvements will…
At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is PROMISES2KIDS Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DEL NORTE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC ↗
- Who funds Soi Dog Foundation USA ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals International ↗
- Who funds Operation For HOPE Foundation ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
- Who funds StandUp for Kids ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELLAS HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY SAN DIEGO HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Crimson Riverstone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.