Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Cooper Foundation Inc

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to support the charitable purposes, programs and services of the cooper health system, a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, and its affiliates which provide medically necessary (see schedule o) healthcare services to all individuals in a non-discriminatory…

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$13MRecreation & Sports$503kEmployment$350kEducation$270kYouth Development$178kReligion$50kFood & Nutrition$30kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $303,948 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,252,737 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $948,789 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$27,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$97M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPACT CHARITY SERIVCES INC$100,000
LARC SCHOOL$50,000
SACRED HEART PARISH$40,000
BLUSOURCE$38,198
TWIST OUT CANCER$27,000
RAISE THE BAR$18,000
MANNA FROM HEAVEN$10,000
CORO MEDICAL LLC$9,275
FOOTBALL HELMETS FOR CAMDEN WHITMAN PARK TIGERS$6,275
SODEXO$5,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RAISE THE BAR: $18k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $179k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $95k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $75k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 8 repeat orgs$861k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$14M
$557k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+0%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $304k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13M · revenue +96%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $350k · revenue +69%
  • CH
    CAMDEN HEALTH AND ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $277k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • CC
    Camden County Dept of Health and Human Services
    one grant, 2022 · $388k
  • CC
    CAMDEN COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -10%
  • RT
    RAISE THE BAR FAMILY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Manna From Heaven. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCharter and Independent Sch…Child & Family Support Serv…Neighborhood Revitalization…Early Childhood Care CentersHome Care and Hospital Syst…Legal Aid & Justice ServicesHealth System Support Organ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $12,551,030 · HealthTHE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION+3 more — $147,000 · HealthCamden County Dept of Health and Human Services — $387,549 · OtherCAMDEN COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC — $100,000 · OtherHEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES IN PHILADELPHIA — $52,199 · OtherROWAN UNIVERSITY — $40,021 · OtherCHURCH OF THE SACRED HEART — $40,000 · OtherBLUSOURCE — $38,198 · Other+5 more — $55,750 · OtherCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES — $350,000 · Human ServicesRAISE THE BAR FAMILY SERVICE — $18,000 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE — $266,253 · EducationLARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $40,000 · EducationCAMDEN HEALTH AND ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION — $277,362 · Youth DevelopmentPhilabundance — $24,434 · Food & NutritionManna From Heaven — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCORIELL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $10,000 · Science & Tech
Health$12,698,030Other$773,717Human Services$368,000Education$356,253Youth Development$277,362Food & Nutrition$34,434Science & Tech$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $12,551,030 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES — $350,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE — $266,253 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMDEN COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetIMPACT CHARITY SERVICES INC — $100,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetHEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES IN PHILADELPHIA — $52,199 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTWIST OUT CANCER — $27,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetPhilabundance — $24,434 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnite for HER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRAISE THE BAR FAMILY SERVICE — $18,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCORIELL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetManna From Heaven — $10,000 over 1y, 27% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New JerseyPA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cooper Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 44%
  • Camden Community Partnership Inc94% of income from government
  • Center for Family Services73% of income from government
  • Coriell Institute for Medical Research Inc44% of income from government
  • Larc School Inc D/B/a the Larc Norcross School1% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph