Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cooper Family Foundation of Mn Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$35kEnvironment$9kPhilanthropy$7kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$3kHealth$3kAnimals$2kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $120) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FREEDOM FARM: $120 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$60k · 11 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$60k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+28%

Still filing today

45%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthReligionPhilanthropyInternationalCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +140%
  • JB
    JACK'S BASKET
    2× · 2021–2024 · $800 · revenue +66%
  • RM
    RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2017–2020 · $750 · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • PN
    PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +26%
  • GS
    GLOBAL SERVICE OFFICE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -4%
  • NL
    NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
2
Royal Promise

Answering the physical and spiritual needs of the most vulnerable, through care and advocacy, to make disciples of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
3
Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless

Since 1986, open your heart to the hungry and homeless has worked to ensureevery minnesotan is free from hunger and homelessness. by partnering with organizations serving those in need, we grow donor engagement and raise awareness to…

4
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
5
House of Charity

Feed those in need, house those experiencing homelessness, and empower individuals to achieve independence.

6
Missions Inc Programs

See Schedule O.Established in 1895, Missions Inc. Programs is a multi-service non-profit organization with a long history of providing services to those who are most in need, each year offering thousands of people, whose lives have been…

7
St John's Lutheran Ministries Inc

St. John's Lutheran Ministries is a community of diverse people sharing God's healing presence. Our mission is to provide living opportunities within nurturing environments of hope, dignity & love.

Human Services
8
Life House Inc

Life house works to reconnect homeless and street youth to their dreams with a vision that no youth will be left homeless, alone, uncared for, or fending for themselves on the streets. our comprehensive service model aims to engage and…

Youth Development
9
Pioneer Home Inc

Our Mission is to promote quality of life in a Christ-like way for those we serve by providing diverse and holistic care, focusing always on individual dignity and worth.

10
Every Meal

Every meal's mission is to fight child hunger through community and school partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
11
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Midwest Mn Wi Ia

To provide a "home away from home and offer support to families seeking medical care for their children.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Life Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Training Leaders International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH — $31,250 · OtherWESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF MN ARBORETUM — $8,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MN ARBORETUMCRU — $3,500 · OtherCRUGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC — $2,810 · OtherLOVE INC — $2,600 · Other+11 more — $8,025 · Other+11 moreOPEN HANDS FOUNDATION — $7,000 · PhilanthropyOPEN HANDS …JACK'S BASKET — $800 · HealthRIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER — $750 · HealthTraining Leaders International — $500 · ReligionLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $250 · ReligionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $500 · InternationalThe Humanity Alliance — $450 · Community ImprovementMinnesota Children's Museum — $320 · Arts & CultureFreedom Farm — $120 · Human Services
Other$56,935Philanthropy$7,000Health$1,550Religion$750International$500Community Improvement$450Arts & Culture$320Human Services$120

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOPEN HANDS FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE OFFICE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACK'S BASKET — $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTraining Leaders International — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Humanity Alliance — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC — $435 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Children's Museum — $320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom Farm — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE OFFICE
  • Who funds NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds JACK'S BASKET
  • Who funds RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Training Leaders International
  • Who funds The Humanity Alliance
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC
  • Who funds Minnesota Children's Museum
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Freedom Farm

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cooper Family Foundation of Mn Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph