· Public charity
The Connie Rice Institute for Urban Peace
Urban peace institute reduces and prevents community violence by applying a public health approach to understand the underlying reasons for violence and create innovative, holistic ways to change the conditions that lead to them.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $120k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+4 grants · $2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHAPTER TWO | $1,035,767 |
| CHAMPIONS IN SERVICE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY & GREATER LOS ANGELES | $428,959 |
| ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT | $348,495 |
| 2ND CALL | $328,506 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS | $199,571 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS COMMUNITY WARRIORS 4 PEACE | $198,215 |
| RESILIENT AGENCY | $184,781 |
| ADVOCATES FOR PEACE AND URBAN UNITY | $167,134 |
| TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC | $164,532 |
| HELPER FOUNDATION (FKA VENICE 2000) | $157,209 |
| ARISE & GO | $106,023 |
| DETOURS MENTORING GROUP INC | $72,826 |
| BROTHERS TAKING RESPONSIBILITY OUR COMMUNITY (BTROC) | $59,046 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CEASEFIRE COMMITTEE - CEASEFIRE | $54,071 |
| WATTS LIFE UNITED INC - WATTS LIFE CAR CLUB | $43,478 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $252k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCHAPTER TWO3× · 2023–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +53%
- CICHAMPIONS IN SERVICE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY AND GREATER LOS ANGELES2× · 2024–2025 · $529k · revenue +20%
- SCSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS3× · 2023–2025 · $456k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISone grant, 2024 · $43k
GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCEone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide resources, education and services to the underserved African-American youth population in Los Angeles.
To provide a safe haven where at risk youth can work togheter to shape and create a safe and healthy community
The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…
.Renounce Denounce Gang Intervention Program is a 10-week cognitive behavioral program for at risk and proven risk youth ages 10-25 who are in gangs who carry weapons or who commit other violent crimes. Our Violence Interrupters are used…
Ayc's mission is to meet the educational and social service needs of low-income, immigrant, at-risk, and adjudicated youth and families of all ethnicities, with a special cultural and linguistic competence with asian americans. by…
To improve the general well-being and education of the asian, pacific islander and other ethnic communities of san diego county. upac recognizes the diverse ethnic and cultural identities and strengths of these communities and their need…
To advance community safety and constitutional rights, including the causes of equal protection under the law and the advancement of First Amendment rights, exclusively for charitable and educational purposes in accordance with Section…
The mission is to strengthen and build community by equipping and empowering our beneficiaries with the skills and tools they need to succeed through 3 programming areas: (1) gang and youth violence prevention and intervention,(2)…
Providing education and other services to youth.
Give positive impact on the lives of disadvantage
OUR GOALS ARE TO REDUCE VIOLENCE, CREATE PEACE AND SAVE LIVES. Transitions To Greatness Foundation (TTGF) is a community-based violence reduction and gang prevention & intervention foundation located in Compton California. Our primary…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toberman Neighborhood Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHAPTER TWO ↗
- Who funds RESILIENT AGENCY ↗
- Who funds CHAMPIONS IN SERVICE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY AND GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS ↗
- Who funds 2ND CALL ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds VENICE 2000 ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR PEACE AND URBAN UNITY ↗
- Who funds TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARISE & GO ↗
- Who funds Paving the Road to Success ↗
- Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Christ-Centered Ministries · Roy and Patricia Disney Family Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Connie Rice Institute for Urban Peace funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Connie Rice Institute for Urban Peace?
Find your warmest path to The Connie Rice Institute for Urban Peace through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.