Skip to content

· Public charity

The Connection Inc

Building safe, healthy, caring communities and inspiring people to reach their full potential as productive and valued citizens.

$9.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$415k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$7.1MHuman Services$2.5MCommunity Improvement$1.3MEducation$634kArts & Culture$216kHousing & Shelter$133kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,839,301, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,113,834 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,274,533 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $564k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.3M
$252,475
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY$414,781
WHEELER CLINIC$328,404
FELLOWSHIP PLACE INC$280,024
THE ACCESS AGENCY$252,475
BH CARE$247,236
WELLMORE INC$246,381
LIBERTY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$70,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $415k → 9%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $143k → 14%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $402k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $389k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $380k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $361k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $333k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 13 repeat orgs$449k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$12M
$449k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+138%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WHEELER CLINIC INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +41%
  • BI
    BHcare Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +23%
  • FP
    FELLOWSHIP PLACE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • CO
    CONTINUUM OF CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $145k · revenue +138%
  • CH
    CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2019 · $143k · revenue +16%
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $108k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
2
Natchaug Hospital Inc

The mission of Natchaug Hospital is to provide a continuum of accessible, community-based services for those living with psychiatric illness and chemical dependency or emotional and related educational disabilities, with a commitment to…

Health
3
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
4
Community Care

To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.

Human Services
5
Connecticut Counseling Centers Inc

To provide substance abuse and mental health treatment services. programs include methadone maintenance, outpatient, hiv, detoxification and dually diagnosed treatments and counseling.

—
6
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.

Human Services
7
Gosnold Inc

Gosnold, inc. was established for the rehabilitation of substance abusers and offers addiction and mental health treatment on an in-patient and out-patient basis.

—
8
Centerpointe Inc

Our mission is to help the people we serve get better, sooner, for longer. centerpointe serves some of the most vulnerable in our communities who have co-occuring mental and physical health diagnoses, and who are experiencing or at risk of…

Health
9
Recovery Network of Programs Inc

To provide comprehensive care and expert recovery services to any individual or family on their journey to restore hope, health, and healing; to empower those in need to get the compassionate and personalized support they deserve to help…

Health
10
Threshold Rehabilitation Services Inc

The mission of threshold, inc. is to enhance the quality of life of persons with disabilities and the economically disadvantaged by providing opportunities to achieve total integration into their community through vocational…

Employment
11
Community Solutions Inc

Positively impacting the lives of our clients and their communities by providing services that facilitate skill development, enhance responsible citizenship, and increase overall well-being.

Health
12
The Connection Inc

Building safe, healthy, caring communities and inspiring people to reach their full potential as productive and valued citizens.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wellmore Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rushford Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHEELER CLINIC INC: $2,006,284 · HealthWHEELER CLINIC INCBHcare Inc: $1,603,213 · HealthBHcare IncWELLMORE INC: $1,150,855 · HealthWELLMORE INCCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $513,305 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INCRushford Center Inc: $217,375 · HealthFELLOWSHIP PLACE INC: $1,481,254 · OtherFELLOWSHIP PLACE INCACCESS AGENCY INC: $1,276,501 · OtherACCESS AGENCY INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $454,617 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUTPRIME TIME: $216,272 · OtherCONTINUUM OF CARE INC: $145,415 · Other+5 more: $481,061 · Other+5 moreFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $2,279,628 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AG…CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $143,002 · Human ServicesCHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR…
Health$5,491,032Other$4,055,120Human Services$2,422,630

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $2,279,628 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetWHEELER CLINIC INC: $2,006,284 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBHcare Inc: $1,603,213 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP PLACE INC: $1,481,254 over 6y, 11% of budgetACCESS AGENCY INC: $1,276,501 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetWELLMORE INC: $1,150,855 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $513,305 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRushford Center Inc: $217,375 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONTINUUM OF CARE INC: $145,415 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $143,002 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLIBERTY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $133,343 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELER CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BHcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds Rushford Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONTINUUM OF CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Newalliance Foundation IncCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Newalliance Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Peoples United Community Foundation · Yale University · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Connection Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Connection Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 70%
  • Liberty Community Services: 80% of income from government
  • Access Agency Inc: 80% of income from government
  • Community Health Resources Inc: 78% of income from government
  • BHcare Inc: 73% of income from government
  • Wellmore Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Continuum of Care Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Fellowship Place Inc: 56% of income from government
  • Wheeler Clinic Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Family & Children's Agency Inc: 46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Connection’s filings →

More from the funding graph