Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Connection Inc

Building safe, healthy, caring communities and inspiring people to reach their full potential as productive and valued citizens.

$9.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$415k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$7.1MHuman Services$2.5MCommunity Improvement$1.3MEducation$634kArts & Culture$216kHousing & Shelter$133kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $1,839,301 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,113,834 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,274,533 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $564k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.3M
$252,475
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY$414,781
WHEELER CLINIC$328,404
FELLOWSHIP PLACE INC$280,024
THE ACCESS AGENCY$252,475
BH CARE$247,236
WELLMORE INC$246,381
LIBERTY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$70,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $415k → 9%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $143k → 14%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $402k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $389k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $380k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $361k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $333k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 13 repeat orgs$449k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$12M
$449k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+138%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WHEELER CLINIC INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +41%
  • BI
    BHcare Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +23%
  • FP
    FELLOWSHIP PLACE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • CO
    CONTINUUM OF CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $145k · revenue +138%
  • CH
    CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2019 · $143k · revenue +16%
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $108k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Counseling Centers Inc

To provide substance abuse and mental health treatment services. programs include methadone maintenance, outpatient, hiv, detoxification and dually diagnosed treatments and counseling.

2
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
3
Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health
4
Family and Children's Aid Inc

Fca is a community-based behavioral health center that offers innovation, responsive and traditional mental health care and services for children, adolescents, adults and their families.

Human Services
5
Community Solutions Inc

Positively impacting the lives of our clients and their communities by providing services that facilitate skill development, enhance responsible citizenship, and increase overall well-being.

Health
6
United Services Inc

United services mission is to provide an effective response to the youth, family, and adult social and behavioral health needs in the community. united services is the most comprehensive private, non-profit center in connecticut providing…

Human Services
7
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
8
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
9
Liberation Programs Inc

Liberation programs' mission is to provide prevention, treatment, community outreach, and recovery services to help individuals and their families impacted by substance use and mental health conditions to foster hope and maintain wellness.

Health
10
The Connection Inc

Building safe, healthy, caring communities and inspiring people to reach their full potential as productive and valued citizens.

Health
11
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

12
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wellmore Inc and the most unlike its peers is Continuum of Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WHEELER CLINIC INC — $2,006,284 · HealthWHEELER CLINIC INCBHcare Inc — $1,603,213 · HealthBHcare IncWELLMORE INC — $1,150,855 · HealthWELLMORE INCCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC — $513,305 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INCRushford Center Inc — $217,375 · HealthFELLOWSHIP PLACE INC — $1,481,254 · OtherFELLOWSHIP PLACE INCACCESS AGENCY INC — $1,276,501 · OtherACCESS AGENCY INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT — $454,617 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUTPRIME TIME — $216,272 · OtherCONTINUUM OF CARE INC — $145,415 · Other+5 more — $481,061 · Other+5 moreFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC — $2,279,628 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AG…CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $143,002 · Human ServicesCHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR…
Health$5,491,032Other$4,055,120Human Services$2,422,630

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC — $2,279,628 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetWHEELER CLINIC INC — $2,006,284 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBHcare Inc — $1,603,213 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP PLACE INC — $1,481,254 over 6y, 11% of budgetACCESS AGENCY INC — $1,276,501 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetWELLMORE INC — $1,150,855 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC — $513,305 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRushford Center Inc — $217,375 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONTINUUM OF CARE INC — $145,415 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $143,002 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLIBERTY COMMUNITY SERVICES — $133,343 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC
  • Who funds WHEELER CLINIC INC
  • Who funds BHcare Inc
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP PLACE INC
  • Who funds ACCESS AGENCY INC
  • Who funds WELLMORE INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC
  • Who funds Rushford Center Inc
  • Who funds CONTINUUM OF CARE INC
  • Who funds CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds LIBERTY COMMUNITY SERVICES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Newalliance Foundation IncCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Newalliance Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Peoples United Community Foundation · Yale University · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Connection Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 70%
  • Liberty Community Services80% of income from government
  • Access Agency Inc80% of income from government
  • Community Health Resources Inc78% of income from government
  • BHcare Inc73% of income from government
  • Wellmore Inc70% of income from government
  • Continuum of Care Inc70% of income from government
  • Fellowship Place Inc56% of income from government
  • Wheeler Clinic Inc50% of income from government
  • Family & Children's Agency Inc46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph