Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Columbia Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$104kEducation$102kHealth$49kHuman Services$21kFood & Nutrition$18kRecreation & Sports$7kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$736k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BITTERROOT CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC$18,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$12,000
MALTBY FOOD BANK$3,000
LAKESIDE SCHOOL$3,000
SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MALTBY FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%MALTBY FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%MALTBY FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%MALTBY FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%MALTBY FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%MALTBY FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 12 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$299k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+33%

Still filing today

42%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Seattle Children's Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +140%
  • LS
    LAKESIDE SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +126%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SP
    Seattle Police Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +33%
  • TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -36%
  • LB
    LITTLE BITS THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
2
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
3
Seattle International Foundation

Seattle international foundation (sif) champions equity and rule of law in central america through good governance and a robust civil society. sif works with other donors to the region to increase philanthropy and to promote collaboration,…

Philanthropy
4
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
5
Seattle Animal Shelter Foundation

Seattle animal foundation (saf) is on a mission to make sure every animal finds the love, care, and forever home they deserve. since 2010, we have been a not-for-profit organization raising critical funds to support life-saving programs,…

Animals
6
Greater Tacoma Community Foundation

Acting as a catalyst, connector, and knowledge facilitator to build racially equitable, accessible, inclusive pierce county where all people can shape and activate the systems that affect our communities, now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
7
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
8
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
9
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
10
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
11
Highline Medical Center Foundation

Highline Medical Center Foundation brings our community together to support exceptional health care, close to home, for all who need it. Thanks to the generosity of our caring neighbors and friends, we help ensure that St Anne Hospital has…

Health
12
Seattle Foundation

Seattle foundation's mission is to ignite powerful and rewarding philanthropy to make greater seattle a stronger, more vibrant community for all.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bitterroot Christian Ministries % Sue Jones. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $69,900 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONSeattle Children's Foundation: $17,500 · OtherSeattle Children's FoundationFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $15,500 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $15,225 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $13,225 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODST THERESE: $12,000 · OtherST THERESEWASHINGTON STATE HORSE PARK: $7,000 · Other+5 more: $14,750 · Other+5 moreBitterroot Christian Ministries % Sue Jones: $104,000 · ReligionBitterroot Christian Ministries % Sue…MALTBY FOOD BANK: $18,000 · Human ServicesLAKESIDE SCHOOL: $17,500 · EducationDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,250 · PhilanthropyPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,500 · InternationalSeattle Police Foundation: $4,100 · Crime & Legal
Other$165,100Religion$104,000Human Services$18,000Education$17,500Philanthropy$5,250International$4,500Crime & Legal$4,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBitterroot Christian Ministries % Sue Jones: $104,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetMALTBY FOOD BANK: $18,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESIDE SCHOOL: $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKINDERING CENTER: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Police Foundation: $4,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bitterroot Christian Ministries % Sue Jones ↗
  • Who funds MALTBY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAKESIDE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Police Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Garneau Nicon Family Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Columbia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Columbia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Columbia Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Columbia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Columbia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph