· Private foundation
The Colin D Fryer Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UKRAN HAGYOMANYOK HAZA NONPROFIT | $32,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| MOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER | $15,000 |
| MOAB SOLUTIONS INC | $10,000 |
| MOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC | $10,000 |
| THE HAVEN | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| GRAND COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| YOUTH GARDEN PROJECT | $5,000 |
| VETERANS | $2,014 |
| NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOC | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| MOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.
15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MSMoab Solutions Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +216%
- MVMOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +19%
- YGYOUTH GARDEN PROJECT4× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $30k
- VOVAN OSDOL FUNDone grant, 2023 · $10k
- GCGRAND COUNTY ED FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the availability of high-quality, affordable childcare in the moab area.
Our dedicated team puts the patient first, delivers quality cost-effective healthcare and promotes wellness to all we serve.
To share stories to help our audiences see the world around us differently.
To secure and maintain habitat for the northern american wild sheep to benefit of hunters and non hunters hunters
To engage in educational activities focused on unique high desert environmental issues.
As stewards of the land, our village community center cultivates togetherness and life-long learning for all ages.
The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Moab Solutions Inc ↗
- Who funds MOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH GARDEN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MOAB VALLEY ↗
- Who funds MOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The May Family Foundation · Alpenglow Foundation · The Carl George Bjorkman Foundation · Palladium Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Colin D Fryer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Colin D Fryer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Colin D Fryer’s filings →