Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Coalition for the Homeless Inc

Because housing is a human right, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in louisville through advocacy, education, and the coordination of our member agencies.

$3.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$627k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$7.0MHealth$5.4MHuman Services$2.4MCrime & Legal$86kPublic Safety & Disaster$32k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $1,613,064 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,583,024 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,969,960 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $115k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
$255,693
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLSPRING$627,401
FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$338,480
ST JOHN CENTER INC$268,770
HOME OF THE INNOCENTS$255,693
ST VINCENT DE PAUL LOUISVILLE$49,392
WAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION$38,909
HOUSE OF RUTH$26,388
VOCAL-KY$8,031
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $25k → 15%WAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $24k → 15%UNITING PARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $10k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $291k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $256k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $246k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $231k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $200k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $191k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $183k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $182k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $49k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 9 repeat orgs$191k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$15M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+106%

Still filing today

78%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WELLSPRING INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.4M · revenue +70%
  • FH
    Family Health Centers Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +58%
  • SJ
    ST JOHN CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +242%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY ATTORNEY
    one grant, 2024 · $86k
  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • UP
    Uniting Partners for Women and Childrengraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +58%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Interfaith Residence D/B/a Doorways

See schedule oas one of the most comprehensive hiv housing programs in the nation, interfaith residence dba doorways, an interfaith organization, offers various housing options and supportive services designed to meet the diverse needs of…

Health
2
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
3
The Center for Women and Families Inc

To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.

Human Services
4
Peter & Paul Community Services Inc

We walk with people facing homelessness on their journey to lifelong stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Rebound Inc

To create positive impact in housing and economic development, while helping families to have access to affordable, quality housing within our historic urban neighborhoods.

6
House of Ruth

House of ruth helps women, children and families in greatest need and with very limited resources to build safe, stable lives and achieve their highest potential. serving the district of columbia since 1976, house of ruth provides…

Housing & Shelter
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Domestic Violence Intervention Services

See schedule oadvancing physical and emotional safety by reducing the impact and occurrence of sexual and domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking through inclusive intervention and prevention services for children, youth, and…

Human Services
9
Status Home Inc F/K/a Jerusalem House Inc

The organization provides afforable, supportive housing for metro atlanta's most vulnerable, particularly those living with or impacted by hiv.

Housing & Shelter
10
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
11
Responsibility House Inc

Supportive housing and substance use disorder treatment prorgrams serve the community by providing support and counseling to families and individuals who struggle with substance use disorders, homelessness, mental illness and/or hiv/aids.

Health
12
Path

Path is a non-profit with a mission to end homelessness for individuals, families, and communities across california by helping those in need with temporary housing, permanent housing, and providing supportive services to help clients…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St John Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Candid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WELLSPRING INC — $5,433,583 · OtherWELLSPRING INCST JOHN CENTER INC — $2,552,636 · OtherST JOHN CENTER INC+6 more — $213,573 · OtherFamily Health Centers Inc — $3,061,741 · HealthFamily Health Centers In…HOUSE OF RUTH INC — $145,597 · Health+1 more — $8,031 · HealthTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC — $1,827,571 · Human ServicesTHE HOME OF TH…WAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION — $101,136 · Human Services+1 more — $10,449 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC — $1,471,922 · Housing & ShelterSOCIETY OF …CANDID — $38,909 · Philanthropy
Other$8,199,792Health$3,215,369Human Services$1,939,156Housing & Shelter$1,471,922Philanthropy$38,909

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWELLSPRING INC — $5,433,583 over 9y, 14% of budgetFamily Health Centers Inc — $3,061,741 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetST JOHN CENTER INC — $2,552,636 over 9y, 16% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC — $1,827,571 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC — $1,471,922 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC — $145,597 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetWAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION — $101,136 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCANDID — $38,909 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniting Partners for Women and Children — $10,449 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORPORATION — $8,386 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELLSPRING INC
  • Who funds Family Health Centers Inc
  • Who funds ST JOHN CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH INC
  • Who funds WAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION
  • Who funds CANDID
  • Who funds Uniting Partners for Women and Children
  • Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORPORATION
  • Who funds VOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Cralle Foundation Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Sam Swope Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Coalition for the Homeless Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph