Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Clarke Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$3.4MArts & Culture$1.9MRecreation & Sports$594kHealth$301kPhilanthropy$260kReligion$102kHuman Services$30kCivil Rights$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$500,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TX AT AUSTIN$750,000
COUNTRY MUSIC HALL OF FAME$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF TX AT SAN ANTONIO$375,000
STAR OF TX RODEO$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 10 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$5.7M
$288k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+27%

Still filing today

40%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    5× · 2017–2023 · $2.3M
  • CM
    COUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +98%
  • Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $500k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN NEUMANN
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • SS
    STATESMAN SEASON FOR CARING
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cancer Support Community Greater San Gabriel Valley

Cancer support community uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association

To improve the cattle raising industry in texas and the southwest through education, market inspection, law enforcement and other member services.

5
Country Radio Broadcasters Inc

To promote the education and growth of the country music industry with a focus on radio. crb provides seminars for professionals involved in country music and radio that promote the exchange of ideas and business practices across the…

6
The Austin Area Commission for the Arts Inc

Austin area arts applauds and advances all arts by welcoming diverse, creative individuals to share their unique talents to inspire our community.

Philanthropy
7
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
8
Young Texans Against Cancer

Young texans against cancer (ytac) is an independent, nonprofit organization comprised of men and women who have been affected by cancer or are seeking to become more actively involved in the cancer community. our organization is focused…

9
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
10
Texas 4000 for Cancer

The mission of texas 4000 is to cultivate student leaders and engage communities in the fight against cancer. we share hope, knowledge and charity through leadership development, grant-making, and our cornerstone event, a 4,000+ mile 70-…

Health
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc and the most unlike its peers is Coal Creek Watershed Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $2,285,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASUNIVERSITY OF TX AT AUSTIN — $750,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TX AT AUSTINAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc — $500,000 · OtherAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte IncIndividual grant recipient — $400,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $375,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $260,000 · OtherGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $250,000 · Other+13 more — $421,100 · Other+13 moreCOUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,615,000 · Arts & CultureCOUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INCTHE CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $150,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR THE ARTSLIVING JOURNEYS — $27,000 · HealthREEL RECOVERY INC — $1,500 · HealthST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $15,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,700 · Human ServicesFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOAL CREEK WATERSHED COALITION — $5,000 · EnvironmentAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP — $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,241,100Arts & Culture$1,765,000Health$28,500Education$15,000Human Services$12,700Environment$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,615,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc — $500,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $375,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $150,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetLIVING JOURNEYS — $27,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOAL CREEK WATERSHED COALITION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREEL RECOVERY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds LIVING JOURNEYS
  • Who funds ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds COAL CREEK WATERSHED COALITION
  • Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP
  • Who funds REEL RECOVERY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL13.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Clarke Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Clarke Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Clarke Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph