Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Christopher L & M Susan Gust Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$525k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$9.0MRecreation & Sports$1.6MEducation$1.4MFood & Nutrition$729kReligion$427kHuman Services$363kEmployment$290kCivil Rights$190kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $655k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$88M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP$525,000
TEAM IMPACT$300,000
CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION$265,529
MISSION OF OUR LADY OF ANGELS CHURCH$164,539
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB (FKA REHAB INSTIUTE OF CHICAGO)$138,040
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$100,000
CHICAGO MISSION HOCKEY$52,500
THE NIGHT MINISTRY$50,000
NOURISHING HOPE (FKA LAKEVIEW FOOD PANTRY)$50,000
INTERNATIONAL SPORTS CORP$50,000
USA HOCKEY FOUNDATION$50,000
HAVE DREAMS$25,000
ROLFE PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION$25,000
ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT REFUGEE RIGHTS$25,000
CHICAGO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $526k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASPIRITECH: $110k → 14%ASPIRITECH: $110k → 14%ASPIRITECH: $50k → 14%ASPIRITECH: $20k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $20k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%OPEN HEART MAGIC: $5k → 14%ASPIRE: $5k → 14%CARE FOR FRIENDS: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $50k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%THE ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
CO
MD
DE
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 68 repeat orgs$477k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
39

Total granted

$14M
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+18%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $301k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +31%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +195% · 93% of their budget
  • TI
    TEAM IMPACT INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $580k · revenue +181%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • VG
    VISTA GRANDE VILLA
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +18%
  • SI
    ST IGNATIUS HOCKEY CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
2
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
3
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
4
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
5
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
6
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
7
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
Chicago United

To achieve parity in economic opportunity for people of color by advancing multiracial leadership in corporate governance, expanding the talent pipline for executive-level management, and growing minority businesses.

Philanthropy
9
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
10
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
11
Volunteers of America of Illinois

Volunteers of america of illinois partners with the people we serve to create transformational and lasting change in their lives through programs that support, empower, and transform.

—
12
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
29/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $2,300,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP: $1,625,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP+92 more: $3,011,433 · Other+92 moreRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $4,937,500 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of ChicagoCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $515,529 · HealthCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC+6 more: $42,680 · HealthTEAM IMPACT INC: $580,000 · PhilanthropyMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $75,815 · PhilanthropyNORTH CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,511 · PhilanthropyASPIRITECH NFP: $290,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $180,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $35,000 · Human Services+4 more: $21,397 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $345,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS: $65,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionIntentional Sports: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsCHICAGO JETS HOCKEY CLUB INC: $125,950 · Recreation & SportsCHICAGO MISSION AAA HOCKEY CLUB: $52,500 · Recreation & SportsHAVE DREAMS: $160,000 · Employment
Other$6,936,433Health$5,495,709Philanthropy$736,326Human Services$526,397Food & Nutrition$411,000Recreation & Sports$328,450Employment$160,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $4,937,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,300,000 over 7y, 93% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $580,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $515,529 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $345,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRITECH NFP: $290,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $180,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHAVE DREAMS: $160,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetIntentional Sports: $150,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetOPTIONS FOR COLLEGE SUCCESS: $137,480 over 7y, 16% of budgetCHICAGO JETS HOCKEY CLUB INC: $125,950 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $75,815 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetNORTH CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetHEPHZIBAH CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $72,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO MUDCATS SPORTS & SOCIAL CLUB: $68,241 over 2y, 16% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $65,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetHAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $57,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $56,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO MISSION AAA HOCKEY CLUB: $52,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUSA HOCKEY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $35,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA GRANDE VILLA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $21,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRoosevelt University: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCARE FOR FRIENDS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $8,443 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HEART MAGIC: $5,397 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARY DEROSA CHARITY NFP: $2,500 over 1y, 22% of budgetHOLISTIC RIDING EQUESTRIAN THERAPY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $511 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds TEAM IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRITECH NFP ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds HAVE DREAMS ↗
  • Who funds Intentional Sports ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR COLLEGE SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO JETS HOCKEY CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Michael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEPHZIBAH CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO MUDCATS SPORTS & SOCIAL CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds HAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO MISSION AAA HOCKEY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds USA HOCKEY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL17.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Circle of Service Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Fred J Brunner Foundation · WP & HB White Foundation · Cme Group Community Foundation F/K/A Nymex Foundation · The Coleman Foundation Inc · Helen V Brach Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Motorola Solutions Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Christopher L & M Susan Gust Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Christopher L & M Susan Gust Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Christopher L & M Susan Gust Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Christopher L & M Susan Gust Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christopher L & M Susan Gust’s filings →

    More from the funding graph