Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Chris a Wachenheim Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$420k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.2MArts & Culture$898kFood & Nutrition$83kHealth$25kSocial Science$15kInternational$10kEnvironment$5k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $350k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAMS COLLEGE$225,000
RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$125,000
COMMUNITY SYNOGOGUE OF RYE$25,000
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$15,000
JAPAN SOCIETY INC$10,000
THE CLARK INSTITUTE$5,000
RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
FRIENDS OF RYE NATURE CENTER$5,000
RYE FREE READING ROOM$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PAN-MASS CHALLENGE: $3k → 7%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $225k → 12%DANA - FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $3k → 16%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $15k → 9%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $10k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $145k → 12%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $15k → 9%THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART INC: $10k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $125k → 12%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $13k → 9%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $8k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $79k → 12%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $10k → 9%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $7k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $75k → 12%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $10k → 9%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $7k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $71k → 12%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $10k → 9%THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $6k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $25k → 12%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $10k → 9%JAPAN SOCIETY INC: $175k → 17%THE CLARK INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $125k → 9%JAPAN SOCIETY INC: $140k → 17%THE CLARK INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $125k → 9%JAPAN SOCIETY INC: $140k → 17%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $75k → 9%JAPAN SOCIETY INC: $136k → 17%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $75k → 9%JAPAN SOCIETY INC: $135k → 17%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $40k → 9%JAPAN SOCIETY INC: $75k → 17%COMMUNITY SYNOGOGUE OF RYE: $25k → 9%JAPAN SOCIETY INC: $10k → 17%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY SYNOGOGUE OF RYE: $10k → 9%FRIENDS OF RYE NATURE CENTER: $5k → 9%RYE FREE READING ROOM: $5k → 9%RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 9%RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 9%RYE FREE READING ROOM: $5k → 9%BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 9%BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 10 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$2.2M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+46%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    JAPAN SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $811k · revenue +24%
  • Williams College
    7× · 2018–2025 · $745k · revenue +36%
  • RC
    RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $470k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • TI
    THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +46%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +75%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rye Country Day School and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Williams College — $745,000 · EducationWilliams CollegeRYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $470,000 · EducationRYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLJAPAN SOCIETY INC — $811,000 · Arts & CultureJAPAN SOCIETY INC+3 more — $39,000 · Arts & CultureFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $82,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY SYNOGOGUE OF RYE — $35,000 · OtherTHE CLARK INSTITUTE — $15,000 · OtherRYE FREE READING ROOM — $12,500 · OtherTHE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $12,500 · Other+1 more — $2,500 · OtherBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $20,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,500 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF RYE NATURE CENTER — $5,000 · Environment
Education$1,215,000Arts & Culture$850,000Other$160,000Health$22,500International$10,000Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJAPAN SOCIETY INC — $811,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetWilliams College — $745,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $470,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $82,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $26,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRYE FREE READING ROOM — $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $12,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Ibm International Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Chris a Wachenheim Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Chris a Wachenheim Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Chris a Wachenheim Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph