Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chief Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$224k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$381kArts & Culture$120kHealth$60kPhilanthropy$50kCommunity Improvement$40kHousing & Shelter$25kRecreation & Sports$20kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$11,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$60,000
CENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$50,000
GREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE$20,000
HAMILTON COUNTY INCLUSIVE PLAYGROUND$20,000
Individual grant recipient$11,250
Individual grant recipient$11,250
Individual grant recipient$7,500
CROSSROADS MISSION AVENUE$5,000
GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD PANTRY RENSSELAER$5,000
CENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARY LANNING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17k → 11%MARY LANNING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17k → 11%MARY LANNING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$412k · 14 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$412k
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

43%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +195%
  • WR
    WOOD RIVER VISION 2020
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +53%
  • CC
    CROSSROADS CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • GI
    GRAND ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM EPIC DISCOVERY CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
  • NC
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +21%
  • YO
    YMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kankakee Community College Foundation

Scholarships and financial assistance to promote educational opportunities at kankakee community college

Education
2
Corning Community College Development Foundation Inc

To solicit, receive, and maintain funds in order to contribute to the long-range goals, objectives, and success of corning community college.

Education
3
Nebraska Community College Assoc

Support for community colleges

—
4
Northampton County Area Community College Foundation

The Northampton Community College Foundation, raises, invests and manages private resources for Northampton Community College, it's students, and it's staff.

Education
5
Northeast State Community College Foundation

To promote the cause of higher education and the mission of northeast state community college; to expand educational opportunities; and to acquire, manage, and administer foundation funds to achieve those objectives.

Education
6
Dakota County Technical College Foundation

The dctc foundation's mission is to foster student success and elevate the academic experience at dakota county technical college by securing resources through strong partnerships with employers, alumni, and the community.

—
7
Greenfield Community College Foundation

Greenfield community college foundation supports greenfield community college (hereafter referred to as the college) by raising funds, developing resources and building philanthropic and community relationships to enhance programs and…

Philanthropy
8
Cleveland Community College Foundation

A conduit for public contributions and other fund-raising activities which benefit programs at Cleveland Community College

Education
9
Hudson Valley Community College Foundation

To receive and maintain funds to aid and advance the welfare, development, purposes and programs of hudson valley community college, its students and alumni.

Education
10
Jefferson Community College Foundation Inc

The mission of the jefferson community college foundation is to work in partnership with the college, the community and alumni to enhance the educational opportunities provided by the college.

Education
11
Lansing Community College Foundation

The lansing community college foundation provides support to inspire and enable the pursuit of education for the betterment of all. our donors change lives and enrich our community.

Education
12
Kellogg Community College Foundation

The kellogg community college foundation generates and encourages philanthropic giving and manages funds exclusively for kcc to enhance the quality of education while building stronger communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Community College Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wood River Vision 2020. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM EPIC DISCOVERY CENTER: $60,000 · OtherGRAND ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM EPIC DISCOVERY C…Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20,000 · OtherNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHAMILTON COUNTY INCLUSIVE PLAYGROUND: $20,000 · OtherHAMILTON COUNTY INCLUSIVE PLAYGROUNDIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherCENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+12 more: $71,250 · Other+12 moreCENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationCENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOU…CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationCENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDA…NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUN…HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationAPPLESEED CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INC: $10,000 · EducationGRAND ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $60,000 · Arts & CultureGRAND ISL…GREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyJASPER NEWTON FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyLEXINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMARY LANNING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $49,999 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS CENTER INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterAURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterDONIPHAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterWOOD RIVER VISION 2020: $20,000 · Community Improvement
Other$306,250Education$210,000Arts & Culture$60,000Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$49,999Housing & Shelter$35,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMARY LANNING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $49,999 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJASPER NEWTON FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWOOD RIVER VISION 2020: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCROSSROADS CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDONIPHAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetAPPLESEED CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLEXINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOasis Counseling International: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEARNEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MARY LANNING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JASPER NEWTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER VISION 2020 ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTURA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONIPHAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds APPLESEED CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Oasis Counseling International ↗
  • Who funds KEARNEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Edgar & Frances Reynolds Foundation Inc · Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati · Greater Grand Island Community Foundation · Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc · Taylor Vern & Esther Char Trust · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chief Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chief Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Chief Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Chief Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chief’s filings →

    More from the funding graph