Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Charlotte Home

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$152kEducation$106kHuman Services$74kRecreation & Sports$43kHousing & Shelter$33kArts & Culture$30kCivil Rights$30kFood & Nutrition$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECCF GREATER LAWRENCE SUMMER FUND$10,000
LAWRENCE FAMILY DEVEL AND EDUC FUND$6,000
ESSEX ART CENTER$5,000
BELLESINI ACADEMY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PROJECT HOME AGAIN$5,000
LAZARUS HOUSE$5,000
WINDRUSH FARM$4,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE$4,000
STRAIGHT AHEAD MINISTRIES$4,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MA$3,500
COMMUNITY INROADS$3,500
TOP NOTCH SCHOLARS$3,500
M VALLEY IMMIGRANT AND EDUC CTR$3,500
GIRLS INC$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY SERVICES OF MERRIMACK VALLEY: $5k → 10%BUDGET BUDDIES: $4k → 8%FAMILY SERVICES OF MERRIMACK VALLEY: $4k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $5k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $4k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $3k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $3k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of The Charlotte Home’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Charlotte Homelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$500k · 28 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
20

Total granted

$500k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+18%

Still filing today

39%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LAZARUS HOUSE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +14%
  • Essex Art Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +92%
  • CI
    COMMUNITY INROADS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • LF
    LAWRENCE FAMILY DEV EDUCATION FD
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • YO
    YWCA OF NORTHEASTERN MA
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • REGIS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
2
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
3
Lexington Playcare Center Inc

LPC's mission is to help children become good friends, proficient problem solvers, creative risk takers, and self-governing, accepting classmates. We want them to be as self-sufficient and independent as they can be based on their age and…

Human Services
4
Laboure College of Healthcare Inc

Laboure college provides high-quality education and prepares women and men for careers in nursing and allied health fields.

5
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
6
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts

Lwvma, a nonpartisan organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy.

Civil Rights
7
Massachusetts Legal Assistance Corp

The massachusetts legal assistance corporation provides leadership and support to improve civil legal services to low-income people in massachusetts through collaboration with the legal services community, the legislature, the public, the…

Crime & Legal
8
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
9
Greater Lawrence Community Action Council Inc

Greater lawrence community action council, inc. creates opportunities by collaborating with the community and empowering individuals to achieve their goals.

10
Lawrence Extended Day Program Inc

Provide after school educational programs to students of the Lawrence School in Brookline MA

Human Services
11
Center for Living & Working Inc

We work to ensure that individuals with disabilities can live independently as equal members of society.

Human Services
12
Brookview House Inc

Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Money Matters Inc and the most unlike its peers is AfterSchool Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ECCF GREATER LAWRENCE SUMMER FUND — $80,000 · OtherECCF GREATER LAWRENCE SUMMER FUNDBELLESINI ACADEMY — $39,000 · OtherBELLESINI ACADEMYLAWRENCE FAMILY DEVEL EDUC FUND — $24,000 · OtherLAWRENCE FAMILY DEVEL EDUC FUNDGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MA — $21,500 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MALIFE SAVER MINISTRIES INC — $20,500 · OtherPRESENTATION OF MARY ACADEMY — $16,500 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE — $14,500 · OtherPROJECT HOME AGAIN — $16,500 · Other+32 more — $169,750 · Other+32 moreCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC — $16,500 · EducationRAR-MA INC — $15,500 · EducationTOP NOTCH SCHOLARS INC — $9,500 · EducationREGIS COLLEGE — $4,000 · EducationLAZARUS HOUSE INC — $31,000 · Housing & ShelterWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC — $17,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesEssex Art Center Inc — $27,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY INROADS INC — $23,000 · PhilanthropyStraight Ahead Ministries INC — $16,500 · Religion
Other$402,250Education$45,500Housing & Shelter$31,000Human Services$29,500Arts & Culture$27,500Philanthropy$23,000Religion$16,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAZARUS HOUSE INC — $31,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEssex Art Center Inc — $27,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY INROADS INC — $23,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetLIFE SAVER MINISTRIES INC — $20,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC — $17,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC — $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetStraight Ahead Ministries INC — $16,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT HOME AGAIN — $16,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetRAR-MA INC — $15,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBREAD & ROSES INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTOP NOTCH SCHOLARS INC — $9,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREGIS COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Notre Dame Education Center-Lawrence Inc — $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE LIVING INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOME HEALTH VNA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Essex Art Center Inc
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INROADS INC
  • Who funds LIFE SAVER MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds Straight Ahead Ministries INC
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME AGAIN
  • Who funds RAR-MA INC
  • Who funds BREAD & ROSES INC
  • Who funds TOP NOTCH SCHOLARS INC
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC
  • Who funds REGIS COLLEGE
  • Who funds The Notre Dame Education Center-Lawrence Inc
  • Who funds WOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC
  • Who funds YWCA NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc)MA37.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Rogers Family Foundation · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Josephine G Russell Trust · RCB Charitable Foundation Inc · We Share A Common Thread Foundation Inc · Artemas W Stearns Trust · Amelia Peabody Foundation · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Foundation M

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Charlotte Home funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc40% of income from government
  • Straight Ahead Ministries Inc27% of income from government
  • Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc11% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc9% of income from government
  • Beyond Soccer Inc7% of income from government
  • Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc5% of income from government
  • Essex Art Center Inc3% of income from government
  • Regis College2% of income from government
  • Cambridge College Inc1% of income from government
  • Women's Money Matters Inc1% of income from government
  • Lazarus House Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Charlotte Home?

Find your warmest path to The Charlotte Home through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph