Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charlotte Home

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$152kEducation$106kHuman Services$74kRecreation & Sports$43kHousing & Shelter$33kArts & Culture$30kCivil Rights$30kFood & Nutrition$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECCF GREATER LAWRENCE SUMMER FUND$10,000
LAWRENCE FAMILY DEVEL AND EDUC FUND$6,000
LAZARUS HOUSE$5,000
BELLESINI ACADEMY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ESSEX ART CENTER$5,000
PROJECT HOME AGAIN$5,000
WINDRUSH FARM$4,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE$4,000
STRAIGHT AHEAD MINISTRIES$4,000
COMMUNITY INROADS$3,500
TOP NOTCH SCHOLARS$3,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MA$3,500
M VALLEY IMMIGRANT AND EDUC CTR$3,500
M VALLEY YMCA LAWRENCE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY SERVICES OF MERRIMACK VALLEY: $5k → 10%BUDGET BUDDIES: $4k → 8%FAMILY SERVICES OF MERRIMACK VALLEY: $4k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $5k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $4k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $3k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $3k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Charlotte Home’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Charlotte Homelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$500k · 28 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
20

Total granted

$500k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+31%

Still filing today

39%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LAZARUS HOUSE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +14%
  • Essex Art Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +92%
  • CI
    COMMUNITY INROADS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • LF
    LAWRENCE FAMILY DEV EDUCATION FD
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • YO
    YWCA OF NORTHEASTERN MA
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • REGIS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
2
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
3
Lexington Playcare Center Inc

LPC's mission is to help children become good friends, proficient problem solvers, creative risk takers, and self-governing, accepting classmates. We want them to be as self-sufficient and independent as they can be based on their age and…

Human Services
4
Laboure College of Healthcare Inc

Laboure college provides high-quality education and prepares women and men for careers in nursing and allied health fields.

—
5
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
6
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts

Lwvma, a nonpartisan organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy.

Civil Rights
7
Massachusetts Legal Assistance Corp

The massachusetts legal assistance corporation provides leadership and support to improve civil legal services to low-income people in massachusetts through collaboration with the legal services community, the legislature, the public, the…

Crime & Legal
8
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
9
Greater Lawrence Community Action Council Inc

Greater lawrence community action council, inc. creates opportunities by collaborating with the community and empowering individuals to achieve their goals.

—
10
Lawrence Extended Day Program Inc

Provide after school educational programs to students of the Lawrence School in Brookline MA

Human Services
11
Center for Living & Working Inc

We work to ensure that individuals with disabilities can live independently as equal members of society.

Human Services
12
Brookview House Inc

Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Money Matters Inc; the most unlike its peers is AfterSchool Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECCF GREATER LAWRENCE SUMMER FUND: $80,000 · OtherECCF GREATER LAWRENCE SUMMER FUNDBELLESINI ACADEMY: $39,000 · OtherBELLESINI ACADEMYLAWRENCE FAMILY DEVEL EDUC FUND: $24,000 · OtherLAWRENCE FAMILY DEVEL EDUC FUNDGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MA: $21,500 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MALIFE SAVER MINISTRIES INC: $20,500 · OtherPRESENTATION OF MARY ACADEMY: $16,500 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE: $14,500 · OtherPROJECT HOME AGAIN: $16,500 · Other+32 more: $169,750 · Other+32 moreCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC: $16,500 · EducationRAR-MA INC: $15,500 · EducationTOP NOTCH SCHOLARS INC: $9,500 · EducationREGIS COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationLAZARUS HOUSE INC: $31,000 · Housing & ShelterWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesEssex Art Center Inc: $27,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY INROADS INC: $23,000 · PhilanthropyStraight Ahead Ministries INC: $16,500 · Religion
Other$402,250Education$45,500Housing & Shelter$31,000Human Services$29,500Arts & Culture$27,500Philanthropy$23,000Religion$16,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAZARUS HOUSE INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEssex Art Center Inc: $27,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY INROADS INC: $23,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetLIFE SAVER MINISTRIES INC: $20,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC: $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetStraight Ahead Ministries INC: $16,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT HOME AGAIN: $16,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetRAR-MA INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBREAD & ROSES INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTOP NOTCH SCHOLARS INC: $9,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREGIS COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Notre Dame Education Center-Lawrence Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE LIVING INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOME HEALTH VNA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Essex Art Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SAVER MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Straight Ahead Ministries INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME AGAIN ↗
  • Who funds RAR-MA INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD & ROSES INC ↗
  • Who funds TOP NOTCH SCHOLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Notre Dame Education Center-Lawrence Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc)MA37.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Rogers Family Foundation · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Josephine G Russell Trust · RCB Charitable Foundation Inc · We Share A Common Thread Foundation Inc · Artemas W Stearns Trust · Amelia Peabody Foundation · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Foundation M

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charlotte Home funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charlotte Home. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Straight Ahead Ministries Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Beyond Soccer Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Essex Art Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Regis College: 2% of income from government
  • Cambridge College Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Women's Money Matters Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Lazarus House Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Charlotte Home?

Find your warmest path to The Charlotte Home through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charlotte Home’s filings →

More from the funding graph